These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30117922)

  • 1. Nonpupil adaptive optics for visual simulation of a customized contact lens.
    Coughlan MF; Goncharov AV
    Appl Opt; 2018 Aug; 57(22):E57-E63. PubMed ID: 30117922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do small-aperture presbyopic corrections influence the visual field?
    Atchison DA; Blazaki S; Suheimat M; Plainis S; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 26769327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system.
    Zheleznyak L; Kim MJ; MacRae S; Yoon G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1724-33. PubMed ID: 22902188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.
    Chateau N; Baude D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):532-9. PubMed ID: 9293522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing vision with angular and radial multifocal designs using Adaptive Optics.
    Vinas M; Dorronsoro C; Gonzalez V; Cortes D; Radhakrishnan A; Marcos S
    Vision Res; 2017 Mar; 132():85-96. PubMed ID: 27484778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VioBio lab adaptive optics: technology and applications by women vision scientists.
    Marcos S; Benedí-García C; Aissati S; Gonzalez-Ramos AM; Lago CM; Radhkrishnan A; Romero M; Vedhakrishnan S; Sawides L; Vinas M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Mar; 40(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 32147855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Compensating presbyopia: a new physiological progressive lens (author's transl)].
    Manent PJ; Pecheur J; Maille M; Claude R
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1981; 4(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 7328271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions.
    Kollbaum PS; Bradley A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Jan; 103(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31734940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical Design of Adaptive Optics Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope with Two Deformable Mirrors.
    Yang J; Wang Y; Rao X; Wei L; Li X; He Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 977():385-392. PubMed ID: 28685469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aberrations associated with rigid contact lenses.
    Atchison DA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Oct; 12(10):2267-73. PubMed ID: 7500208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spherical aberration of aspheric contact lenses on eye.
    Hammer RM; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Aug; 71(8):522-8. PubMed ID: 7970569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An objective and subjective comparative analysis of diffractive and front surface aspheric contact lens designs used to correct presbyopia.
    Brenner MB
    CLAO J; 1994 Jan; 20(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8149568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
    Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Ho A
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual performance with aspheric rigid contact lenses.
    Oxenberg LD; Carney LG
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Dec; 66(12):818-21. PubMed ID: 2626246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theoretical calculation of the longitudinal spherical aberration of rigid and soft contact lenses.
    Cox I
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Apr; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2342790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.