These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30118155)

  • 1. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Pena G; Kuang B; Szpak Z; Cowled P; Dawson J; Fitridge R
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2020 Nov; 9(11):623-631. PubMed ID: 33095125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and Reliability of Two Digital Wound Measurement Tools after Surgery in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
    Aarts P; van Huijstee JC; Ragamin A; Reeves JL; van Montfrans C; van der Zee HH; Prens EP
    Dermatology; 2023; 239(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 35998557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating accuracy and reliability of active stereophotogrammetry using MAVIS III Wound Camera for three-dimensional assessment of hypertrophic scars.
    Su S; Sinha S; Gabriel V
    Burns; 2017 Sep; 43(6):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28363664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry.
    Chaby G; Lok C; Thirion JP; Lucien A; Senet P
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Nov; 5(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 29037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Wound Camera and Correlation With Routine Ruler Measurement in Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.
    Lasschuit JWJ; Featherston J; Tonks KTT
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 15(6):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33243005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice.
    Hammond CE; Nixon MA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21483270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound perimeter, area, and volume measurement based on laser 3D and color acquisition.
    Pavlovčič U; Diaci J; Možina J; Jezeršek M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Apr; 14():39. PubMed ID: 25907428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.
    Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability and clinical utility in stereophotogrammetric measurements of wounds.
    Davis AJ; Nishimura J; Seton J; Goodman BL; Ho CH; Bogie KM
    J Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 22(2):90-2, 94-7. PubMed ID: 23665664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transrectal three-dimensional fetal volumetry and crown-rump length measurement during early gestation in mares: Intra- and inter-observer reliability and agreement.
    Becsek A; Tzanidakis N; Blanco M; Bollwein H
    Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 126():266-271. PubMed ID: 30590249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry-based method for wound measurement in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; De Mil TA; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2015 Mar; 203(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 25665920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.