These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30118180)
1. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures. Bell KL; Burgess KS; Botsch JC; Dobbs EK; Read TD; Brosi BJ Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):431-455. PubMed ID: 30118180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection. Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing whole-genome shotgun sequencing and DNA metabarcoding approaches for species identification and quantification of pollen species mixtures. Bell KL; Petit RA; Cutler A; Dobbs EK; Macpherson JM; Read TD; Burgess KS; Brosi BJ Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):16082-16098. PubMed ID: 34824813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions. Pornon A; Escaravage N; Burrus M; Holota H; Khimoun A; Mariette J; Pellizzari C; Iribar A; Etienne R; Taberlet P; Vidal M; Winterton P; Zinger L; Andalo C Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27282. PubMed ID: 27255732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the effect of pollen exine rupture on metabarcoding with Illumina sequencing. Swenson SJ; Gemeinholzer B PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245611. PubMed ID: 33529182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant-pollinator interactions. Bell KL; Fowler J; Burgess KS; Dobbs EK; Gruenewald D; Lawley B; Morozumi C; Brosi BJ Appl Plant Sci; 2017 Jun; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 28690929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers. Fahner NA; Shokralla S; Baird DJ; Hajibabaei M PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157505. PubMed ID: 27310720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the efficacy of sample collection approaches and DNA metabarcoding for identifying the diversity of plants utilized by nectivorous bats. Edwards CE; Swift JF; Lance RF; Minckley TA; Lindsay DL Genome; 2019 Jan; 62(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 30481069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental quantification of pollen with DNA metabarcoding using ITS1 and trnL. Baksay S; Pornon A; Burrus M; Mariette J; Andalo C; Escaravage N Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4202. PubMed ID: 32144370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome-skimming provides accurate quantification for pollen mixtures. Lang D; Tang M; Hu J; Zhou X Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1433-1446. PubMed ID: 31325909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preservation methods of honey bee-collected pollen are not a source of bias in ITS2 metabarcoding. Quaresma A; Brodschneider R; Gratzer K; Gray A; Keller A; Kilpinen O; Rufino J; van der Steen J; Vejsnæs F; Pinto MA Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Nov; 193(12):785. PubMed ID: 34755261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples. Arulandhu AJ; Staats M; Hagelaar R; Voorhuijzen MM; Prins TW; Scholtens I; Costessi A; Duijsings D; Rechenmann F; Gaspar FB; Barreto Crespo MT; Holst-Jensen A; Birck M; Burns M; Haynes E; Hochegger R; Klingl A; Lundberg L; Natale C; Niekamp H; Perri E; Barbante A; Rosec JP; Seyfarth R; Sovová T; Van Moorleghem C; van Ruth S; Peelen T; Kok E Gigascience; 2017 Oct; 6(10):1-18. PubMed ID: 29020743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular- and pollen-based vegetation analysis in lake sediments from central Scandinavia. Parducci L; Matetovici I; Fontana SL; Bennett KD; Suyama Y; Haile J; Kjaer KH; Larsen NK; Drouzas AD; Willerslev E Mol Ecol; 2013 Jul; 22(13):3511-24. PubMed ID: 23587049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How reliable is metabarcoding for pollen identification? An evaluation of different taxonomic assignment strategies by cross-validation. San Martin G; Hautier L; Mingeot D; Dubois B PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16567. PubMed ID: 38313030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. Elbrecht V; Leese F PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology. Bell KL; Burgess KS; Okamoto KC; Aranda R; Brosi BJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():110-6. PubMed ID: 26751251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative multi-locus metabarcoding and waggle dance interpretation reveal honey bee spring foraging patterns in Midwest agroecosystems. Richardson RT; Curtis HR; Matcham EG; Lin CH; Suresh S; Sponsler DB; Hearon LE; Johnson RM Mol Ecol; 2019 Feb; 28(3):686-697. PubMed ID: 30549365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]