These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30119048)

  • 41. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Be(a)ware of spider! An attentional blink study on fear detection.
    D'Alessandro L; Gemignani A; Castellani E; Sebastiani L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2009 Sep; 147(3):95-103. PubMed ID: 20014655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Emotion; 2020 Jun; 20(4):572-589. PubMed ID: 30869941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings.
    Glickman M; Lamy D
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perception of temporal order during the attentional blink: Using stimulus salience to modulate prior entry.
    Lagroix HE; Patten JW; Di Lollo V; Spalek TM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1064-73. PubMed ID: 26883840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The sparing is far from spurious: reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Hulleman J; Spalek T; Kawahara J; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):396-408. PubMed ID: 20822301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search.
    Ghorashi S; Enns JT; Klein RM; Di Lollo V
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):7.1-12. PubMed ID: 20377284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink.
    Du F; Yang J; Yin Y; Zhang K; Abrams RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):944-50. PubMed ID: 23444107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
    Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.
    Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 29116615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing.
    Zhang D; Shao L; Nieuwenstein M; Zhou X
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17926024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.
    Mandal A; Liesefeld AM; Liesefeld HR
    J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 44(30):. PubMed ID: 38886058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.