BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30120037)

  • 1. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
    Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case-Control Comparative Analysis.
    Lai HW; Chen CJ; Lin YJ; Chen SL; Wu HK; Wu YT; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Chen DR
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(22):e3810. PubMed ID: 27258520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
    Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing patterns of breast cancer on preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and resection margin in breast conserving therapy.
    Kim OH; Kim SJ; Lee JS
    Breast Dis; 2016 Feb; 36(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27177341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MarginProbe© reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.
    Blohmer JU; Tanko J; Kueper J; Groß J; Völker R; Machleidt A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 26796680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
    Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
    Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
    Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
    Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive or close margins in breast conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary?
    Gurdal SO; Karanlik H; Cabioglu N; Ozcinar B; Yavuz E; Tuzlali S; Ozmen V
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 22440741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
    Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast conserving therapy.
    Hadzikadic Gusic L; McGuire KP; Ozmen T; Soran A; Thomas CR; McAuliffe PF; Diego EJ; Bonaventura M; Johnson RR; Ahrendt GM
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 24338603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
    Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Margin index is not a reliable tool for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS.
    Fisher CS; Klimberg VS; Khan S; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3155-9. PubMed ID: 21947593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
    Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
    Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of third and fourth re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
    Subhas G; Shah AJ; Gupta A; Cook J; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Goriel Y; Mittal VK
    Int Surg; 2011; 96(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 21675615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Margin width should not still enforce a systematic surgical re-excision in the conservative treatment of early breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma.
    Jaffré I; Campion L; Dejode M; Bordes V; Sagan C; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Andrieux N; Classe JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3831-8. PubMed ID: 23838905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
    Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.