986 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30120038)
21. Comparison of
Regula N; Kostaras V; Johansson S; Trampal C; Lindström E; Lubberink M; Velikyan I; Sörensen J
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4993. PubMed ID: 32193430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Head-to-head comparison of
Zhang Y; Lin Z; Li T; Wei Y; Yu M; Ye L; Cai Y; Yang S; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15993. PubMed ID: 36163353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27.
Uprimny C; Kroiss AS; Decristoforo C; Fritz J; von Guggenberg E; Kendler D; Scarpa L; di Santo G; Roig LG; Maffey-Steffan J; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 44(6):941-949. PubMed ID: 28138747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The meta-analysis of the effect of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT diagnosis of prostatic cancer compared with bone scan.
Zhao R; Li Y; Nie L; Qin K; Zhang H; Shi H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e25417. PubMed ID: 33847640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors Predicting Metastatic Disease in
Chiu LW; Lawhn-Heath C; Behr SC; Juarez R; Perez PM; Lobach I; Bucknor MD; Hope TA; Flavell RR
J Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1779-1785. PubMed ID: 32303599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Whole-Body Integrated [
Guberina N; Hetkamp P; Ruebben H; Fendler W; Grueneisen J; Suntharalingam S; Kirchner J; Puellen L; Harke N; Radtke JP; Umutlu L; Hadaschik BA; Herrmann K; Forsting M; Wetter A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):788-796. PubMed ID: 31482413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT replace conventional imaging modalities for primary lymph node and bone staging of prostate cancer?
Esen T; Kılıç M; Seymen H; Acar Ö; Demirkol MO
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):218-220. PubMed ID: 31113757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of
McCarthy M; Francis R; Tang C; Watts J; Campbell A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 30890448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of uptake time on image quality of [
van der Sar ECA; Viol SLM; Braat AJAT; van Rooij R; Lam MGEH; de Jong HWAM; de Keizer B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7619-7628. PubMed ID: 37093883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36.
van Boxtel W; Lütje S; van Engen-van Grunsven ICH; Verhaegh GW; Schalken JA; Jonker MA; Nagarajah J; Gotthardt M; van Herpen CML
Theranostics; 2020; 10(5):2273-2283. PubMed ID: 32089741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiphasic
Beheshti M; Manafi-Farid R; Geinitz H; Vali R; Loidl W; Mottaghy FM; Langsteger W
J Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 32060214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.
Budäus L; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Steuber T; Rosenbaum C
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraindividual Comparison of
Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
