323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30120116)
1. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of left-censored quantitative outcome: example of procalcitonin level].
Asselineau J; Thiébaut R; Perez P; Pinganaud G; Chêne G
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Jun; 55(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 17467942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of low quantity genes: a hierarchical model for analyzing censored quantitative real-time PCR data.
Boyer TC; Hanson T; Singer RS
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64900. PubMed ID: 23741414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A distribution-based multiple imputation method for handling bivariate pesticide data with values below the limit of detection.
Chen H; Quandt SA; Grzywacz JG; Arcury TA
Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Mar; 119(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 21097385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bivariate Left-Censored Measurements in Biomonitoring: A Bayesian Model for the Determination of Biological Limit Values Based on Occupational Exposure Limits.
Martin Remy A; Wild P
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 28475797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data fitting approach more critical than exposure scenarios and treatment of censored data for quantitative microbial risk assessment.
Poma HR; Kundu A; Wuertz S; Rajal VB
Water Res; 2019 May; 154():45-53. PubMed ID: 30771706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Statistical Treatments of Left-Censored Environmental Data Using Coincident Uncensored Data Sets. II. Group Comparisons.
Antweiler RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13439-46. PubMed ID: 26490190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
Newton E; Rudel R
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lasso regularization for left-censored Gaussian outcome and high-dimensional predictors.
Soret P; Avalos M; Wittkop L; Commenges D; Thiébaut R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):159. PubMed ID: 30514234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequentist and Bayesian tolerance intervals for setting specification limits for left-censored gamma distributed drug quality attributes.
Montes RO
Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(2):168-184. PubMed ID: 37871968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
