These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122093)

  • 1. Remote Scene Size-up Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in a Simulated Mass Casualty Incident.
    Sibley AK; Jain TN; Butler M; Nicholson B; Sibley D; Smith D; Atkinson P
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2019; 23(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 30122093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology-Assisted Triage versus Standard Practice in Triaging Casualties by Paramedic Students in a Mass-Casualty Incident Scenario.
    Jain T; Sibley A; Stryhn H; Hubloue I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Aug; 33(4):375-380. PubMed ID: 30001765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology Versus Standard Practice in Identification of Hazards at a Mass Casualty Incident Scenario by Primary Care Paramedic Students.
    Jain T; Sibley A; Stryhn H; Hubloue I
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2018 Oct; 12(5):631-634. PubMed ID: 29382398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation.
    Lee CW; McLeod SL; Van Aarsen K; Klingel M; Franc JM; Peddle MB
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2016 Apr; 31(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 26857296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event.
    Jones N; White ML; Tofil N; Pickens M; Youngblood A; Zinkan L; Baker MD
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24601857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology versus Standard Practice of Scene Assessment by Paramedic Students of a Mass-Gathering Event.
    Jain T; Sibley A; Stryhn H; Lund A; Hubloue I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2021 Dec; 36(6):756-761. PubMed ID: 34702422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability and perceived utility of drone technology among emergency medical service responders and incident commanders for mass casualty incident management.
    Hart A; Chai PR; Griswold MK; Lai JT; Boyer EW; Broach J
    Am J Disaster Med; 2017; 12(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 29468628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paramedic accuracy using SALT triage after a brief initial training.
    Deluhery MR; Lerner EB; Pirrallo RG; Schwartz RB
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 21591923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.
    Glow SD; Colucci VJ; Allington DR; Noonan CW; Hall EC
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Aug; 28(4):334-41. PubMed ID: 23594616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A remotely piloted aircraft system in major incident management: concept and pilot, feasibility study.
    Abrahamsen HB
    BMC Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 15():12. PubMed ID: 26054527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sort, Assess, Life-Saving Intervention, Triage With Drone Assistance in Mass Casualty Simulation: Analysis of Educational Efficacy.
    Hartman EN; Daines B; Seto C; Shimshoni D; Feldman ME; LaBrunda M
    Cureus; 2020 Sep; 12(9):e10572. PubMed ID: 33110714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unmanned aerial vehicle based intelligent triage system in mass-casualty incidents using 5G and artificial intelligence.
    Lu J; Wang X; Chen L; Sun X; Li R; Zhong W; Fu Y; Yang L; Liu W; Han W
    World J Emerg Med; 2023; 14(4):273-279. PubMed ID: 37425090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of START and SALT triage methodologies to reference standard definitions and to a field mass casualty simulation.
    Silvestri S; Field A; Mangalat N; Weatherford T; Hunter C; McGowan Z; Stamile Z; Mattox T; Barfield T; Afshari A; Ralls G; Papa L
    Am J Disaster Med; 2017; 12(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28822212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.
    Bolduc C; Maghraby N; Fok P; Luong TM; Homier V
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Jun; 33(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 29661267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First Responder Accuracy Using SALT after Brief Initial Training.
    Lee CW; McLeod SL; Peddle MB
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Oct; 30(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 26451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triage Performance of School Personnel Using the SALT System.
    Celik DH; Mencl FR; Debacker M; Kurland L; Wilber ST; Frey JA
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2019 Aug; 34(4):401-406. PubMed ID: 31389327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary mass casualty incident triage: evidence for the benefit of yearly brief re-training from a simulation study.
    Dittmar MS; Wolf P; Bigalke M; Graf BM; Birkholz T
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2018 Apr; 26(1):35. PubMed ID: 29703219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-hour intervention using START improves prehospital triage of mass casualty incidents.
    Risavi BL; Salen PN; Heller MB; Arcona S
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2001; 5(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 11339732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Use of Field Triage in Disaster and Mass Casualty Incidents: A Survey of Current Practices by EMS Personnel.
    Ryan K; George D; Liu J; Mitchell P; Nelson K; Kue R
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 29425472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot test of the SALT mass casualty triage system.
    Cone DC; Serra J; Burns K; MacMillan DS; Kurland L; Van Gelder C
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 19731169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.