These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122102)

  • 1. Additively manufactured versus conventionally pressed cranioplasty implants: An accuracy comparison.
    Peel S; Eggbeer D; Burton H; Hanson H; Evans PL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Sep; 232(9):949-961. PubMed ID: 30122102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of design considerations in complex craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants.
    Peel S; Bhatia S; Eggbeer D; Morris DS; Hayhurst C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Jun; 231(6):509-524. PubMed ID: 28019190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Schedule feasibility and workflow for additive manufacturing of titanium plates for ranioplasty in canine skull tumors.
    James J; Oblak ML; Zur Linden AR; James FMK; Phillips J; Parkes M
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Jun; 16(1):180. PubMed ID: 32505206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer.
    Tan ET; Ling JM; Dinesh SK
    J Neurosurg; 2016 May; 124(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 26566203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymere (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique.
    Saringer W; Nöbauer-Huhmann I; Knosp E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Nov; 144(11):1193-203. PubMed ID: 12434176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cheap technical solution for cranioplasty treatments.
    Hieu LC; Vander Sloten J; Bohez E; Phien HN; Vatcharaporn E; An PV; To NC; Binh PH
    Technol Health Care; 2004; 12(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 15328456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-Aided-Design/Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Titanium Cranioplasty in a Child: Critical Appraisal.
    Zegers T; Koper D; Lethaus B; Kessler P; Ter Laak-Poort M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(1):237-240. PubMed ID: 31714337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considerations in computer-aided design for inlay cranioplasty: technical note.
    Nout E; Mommaerts MY
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 29313149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.
    Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary Review on Craniectomy and Cranioplasty; Part 2: Material Selection and Plate Manufacture.
    Hatamleh MM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 May; 33(3):842-845. PubMed ID: 34334754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of extensive frontal cranioplasty defects.
    Hatamleh MM; Cartmill M; Watson J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):2018-22. PubMed ID: 24220395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas.
    Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Axmann D; Engel EM; Weber H; Huettig F
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e460-e468. PubMed ID: 29125215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment.
    Thimukonda Jegadeesan J; Baldia M; Basu B
    Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():63-82. PubMed ID: 36272686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cranioplasty prosthesis manufacturing based on reverse engineering technology.
    Chrzan R; Urbanik A; Karbowski K; Moskała M; Polak J; Pyrich M
    Med Sci Monit; 2012 Jan; 18(1):MT1-6. PubMed ID: 22207125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of manufacturing techniques on custom-made titanium cranioplasty plates: A pilot study.
    Davey AV
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2017-2027. PubMed ID: 29096989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
    Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) titanium implants for cranial and craniofacial defect reconstruction].
    Scholz M; Eufinger H; Wehmöller M; Heuser L; Harders A
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 1997; 58(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 9446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate?
    Fishman Z; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn O; Hardisty M; Whyne CM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 38430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous repair of two large cranial defects using rapid prototyping and custom computer-designed titanium plates: a case report.
    Morrison DA; Guy DT; Day RE; Lee GY
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 22292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cranioplasty using computer-designed implants (preliminary report)].
    Gulyás G; Pulay G; Volant M; Bárdosi T; Farkas G; Juharosi Z
    Orv Hetil; 1995 Oct; 136(44):2393-7. PubMed ID: 7478484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.