BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122329)

  • 1. It is necessary to exam bottom and top slide smears of EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer.
    Lee JC; Kim H; Kim HW; Lee J; Paik KH; Kang J; Hwang JH; Kim J
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Dec; 17(6):553-558. PubMed ID: 30122329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
    Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
    Trisolini E; Armellini E; Paganotti A; Veggiani C; Bozzola C; Frattini M; Pizio C; Mancuso G; Andorno S; Boldorini R
    Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeated endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) improved diagnostic yield of inconclusive initial cytology for suspected pancreatic cancer and unknown intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.
    Prachayakul V; Sriprayoon T; Asawakul P; Pongprasobchai S; Pausawasdi N; Kachintorn U
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Feb; 95 Suppl 2():S68-74. PubMed ID: 22574532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist.
    Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Yield and Associated Change in Access to Appropriate Care.
    Mitchell RA; Stanger D; Shuster C; Telford J; Lam E; Enns R
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():7678403. PubMed ID: 27648440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of Malignancies in Patients with Inconclusive or Negative Results of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Jeong H; Park CS; Kim KB; Han JH; Yoon SM; Chae HB; Youn SJ; Park SM
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 71(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29566476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An expanded training program for endosonographers improved self-diagnosed accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas.
    Harada R; Kato H; Fushimi S; Iwamuro M; Inoue H; Muro S; Sakakihara I; Noma Y; Yamamoto N; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Okada H; Yamamoto K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):1119-23. PubMed ID: 24896656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic influence of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in IPMN-derived invasive adenocarcinoma.
    Suzuki R; Irie H; Takagi T; Sugimoto M; Konno N; Sato Y; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Marubashi S; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(1):974. PubMed ID: 30314433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration for peri-arterial soft tissue cuffs without identifiable pancreas mass on CT and EUS: a prospective comparative study.
    Paik WH; Yoon H; Park DH; Jung K; Lee SS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1463-8. PubMed ID: 24642218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing S100A6 expression in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens: a promising diagnostic method of pancreatic cancer.
    Zihao G; Jie Z; Yan L; Jing Z; Jing C; Xue L; Jing Z; Heng LW; Ru G; Jianyu H
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 22914344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
    Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.
    Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort.
    Ge PS; Wani S; Watson RR; Sedarat A; Kim S; Marshall C; Wilson RH; Makker J; Mohamadnejad M; Komanduri S; Muthusamy VR
    Pancreas; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 29401169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for solid pancreatic neoplasms.
    Malak M; Masuda D; Ogura T; Imoto A; Abdelaal UM; Sabet EA; Abo Dahab LH; Higuchi K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26365063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.