These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122472)

  • 1. Comparative study of actuation systems for portable upper limb exoskeletons.
    Manna SK; Dubey VN
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Oct; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 30122472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical Design and Kinematic Modeling of a Cable-Driven Arm Exoskeleton Incorporating Inaccurate Human Limb Anthropomorphic Parameters.
    Chen W; Li Z; Cui X; Zhang J; Bai S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31618848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and Interaction Control of a New Bilateral Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Device.
    Miao Q; Zhang M; Wang Y; Xie SQ
    J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():7640325. PubMed ID: 29104747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Series elastic actuation of an elbow rehabilitation exoskeleton with axis misalignment adaptation.
    Wu KY; Su YY; Yu YL; Lin KY; Lan CC
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():567-572. PubMed ID: 28813880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and kinematic analysis of a novel upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Zeiaee A; Soltani-Zarrin R; Langari R; Tafreshi R
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():759-764. PubMed ID: 28813911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Soft Exosuit for Flexible Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation.
    Lessard S; Pansodtee P; Robbins A; Trombadore JM; Kurniawan S; Teodorescu M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Aug; 26(8):1604-1617. PubMed ID: 29994617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exoskeleton robots for lower limb assistance: A review of materials, actuation, and manufacturing methods.
    Hussain F; Goecke R; Mohammadian M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 34254562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A passively safe cable driven upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton.
    Chen Y; Fan J; Zhu Y; Zhao J; Cai H
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S197-202. PubMed ID: 26410484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a powered variable-stiffness exoskeleton device for elbow rehabilitation.
    Liu Y; Guo S; Hirata H; Ishihara H; Tamiya T
    Biomed Microdevices; 2018 Aug; 20(3):64. PubMed ID: 30074095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference path generation for upper-arm exoskeletons considering scapulohumeral rhythms.
    Soltani-Zarrin R; Zeiaee A; Langari R; Robson N
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():753-758. PubMed ID: 28813910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical considerations in providing an upper limb exoskeleton device for stroke patients.
    Bulboacă AE; Bolboacă SD; Bulboacă AC
    Med Hypotheses; 2017 Apr; 101():61-64. PubMed ID: 28351495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of a clinically relevant upper-limb exoskeleton robot for stroke patients with spasticity.
    Lee DJ; Bae SJ; Jang SH; Chang PH
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():622-627. PubMed ID: 28813889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral robots for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects.
    Sheng B; Zhang Y; Meng W; Deng C; Xie S
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):587-606. PubMed ID: 27117423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effectiveness of the Armeo ® device in the rehabilitation of the upper limb of stroke's patients. A review of the literature].
    Yáñez-Sánchez A; Cuesta-Gómez A
    Rev Neurol; 2020 Feb; 70(3):93-102. PubMed ID: 31994166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and Development of a Portable Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation.
    Wang D; Meng Q; Meng Q; Li X; Yu H
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Dec; 26(12):2376-2386. PubMed ID: 30387735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel low cost VR-based upper limb stroke rehabilitation platform using Wii technology.
    Tsekleves E; Paraskevopoulos IT; Warland A; Kilbride C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 25391221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
    Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inverse kinematic analysis and trajectory planning of a modular upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton.
    Li G; Fang Q; Xu T; Zhao J; Cai H; Zhu Y
    Technol Health Care; 2019; 27(S1):123-132. PubMed ID: 31045532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation.
    Pignolo L
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):955-60. PubMed ID: 19841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.