153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122533)
21. Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.
Marinova M; Edon B; Wolter K; Katsimbari B; Schild HH; Strunk HM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2015; 31(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 26308674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of calcium tablets on interpretation of lumbar spine DXA scans.
Kendler DL; Kiebzak GM; Ambrose CG; Dinu C; Robertson S; Schmeer P; Van Pelt JL
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 16731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Osteoporosis in adults with cerebral palsy: feasibility of DXA screening and risk factors for low bone density.
Marciniak C; Gabet J; Lee J; Ma M; Brander K; Wysocki N
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Apr; 27(4):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 26576540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Subregional DXA-derived vertebral bone mineral measures are stronger predictors of failure load in specimens with lower areal bone mineral density, compared to those with higher areal bone mineral density.
Briggs AM; Perilli E; Codrington J; Reynolds KJ; Parkinson IH; Wark JD
Calcif Tissue Int; 2014 Aug; 95(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 24858710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women.
Ott SM; Ichikawa LE; LaCroix AZ; Scholes D
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 18990595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spinal Fusion in Pediatric Patients With Low Bone Density: Defining the Value of DXA.
Cohen LL; Berry JG; Ma NS; Cook DL; Hedequist DJ; Karlin LI; Emans JB; Hresko MT; Snyder BD; Glotzbecker MP
J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Aug; 42(7):e713-e719. PubMed ID: 35605209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of spine bone mineral density in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: impact of scan projection.
Dubner SE; Shults J; Leonard MB; Zemel BS; Sembhi H; Burnham JM
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 18164636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral densitometry may flaw osteopenic/osteoporotic interpretations and mislead assessment of antiresorptive therapy effectiveness.
Bolotin HH
Bone; 2001 May; 28(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 11344055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-energy CT-based phantomless in vivo three-dimensional bone mineral density assessment of the lumbar spine.
Wichmann JL; Booz C; Wesarg S; Kafchitsas K; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Khan MF
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):778-84. PubMed ID: 24475863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bone measures in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents: disparity between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.
Pitukcheewanont P; Safani D; Church J; Gilsanz V
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1393-6. PubMed ID: 15702261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Combined vertebral assessment and bone densitometry increases the prevalence and severity of osteoporosis in patients referred to DXA scanning.
Mrgan M; Mohammed A; Gram J
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 23769657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Bodeen G; Brett A; Brown JK; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24880495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bone Mineral Density T-Scores Derived from CT Attenuation Numbers (Hounsfield Units): Clinical Utility and Correlation with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
Hendrickson NR; Pickhardt PJ; Del Rio AM; Rosas HG; Anderson PA
Iowa Orthop J; 2018; 38():25-31. PubMed ID: 30104921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.
Sung KH; Choi Y; Cho GH; Chung CY; Park MS; Lee KM
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 29404660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: preliminary results using a novel lumbar spine phantom-based MRI scoring method.
Din RU; Nishtar T; Cheng X; Yang H
Radiol Med; 2024 Jun; 129(6):912-924. PubMed ID: 38625420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do Textiles Impact DXA Bone Density or Body Composition Results?
Siglinsky E; Binkley N; Krueger D
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):303-307. PubMed ID: 28988694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Effect of the Lumbar Vertebral Malpositioning on Bone Mineral Density Measurements of the Lumbar Spine by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Izadyar S; Golbarg S; Takavar A; Zakariaee SS
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 26778450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
