158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122891)
1. Comparative evaluation of tomographic and biometric characteristics in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt's striae: a contralateral eye study.
Sedaghat MR; Askarizadeh F; Narooie-Noori F; Rakhshandadi T; Ostadi-Moghadam H; Rajabi S
Clin Ophthalmol; 2018; 12():1383-1390. PubMed ID: 30122891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A contralateral eye study comparing characteristics of corneal endothelial cells in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt's striae.
Ostadi-Moghaddam H; Sedaghat MR; Rakhshandadi T; Rajabi S; Narooie-Noori F; Askarizadeh F
J Curr Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 30(3):228-233. PubMed ID: 30197952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Corneal Biomechanics in Subjects with Bilateral Keratoconus with Unilateral Vogt's Striae.
Askarizadeh F; Sedaghat MR; Ostadi-Moghaddam H; Narooie-Noori F; Rakhshandadi T; Rajabi S
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 29367935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Refractive characteristics of keratoconus eyes with corneal Vogt's striae: A contralateral eye study.
Rakhshandadi T; Sedaghat MR; Askarizadeh F; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Khabazkhoob M; Yekta A; Narooie-Noori F
J Optom; 2021; 14(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 32507616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal densitometry in bilateral keratoconus patients with unilateral corneal Vogt's striae: a contralateral eye study.
Wei S; Li J; Li Y; Zhang Y; Cai Y; Du J; Liu J; Wang Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):885-897. PubMed ID: 36153430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of Vogt's striae in keratoconus as evaluated by in vivo confocal microscopy.
Mocan MC; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M; Orhan M
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 36(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 18700919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral horizontal Vogt's striae in keratoconus.
Güngör IU; Beden U; Sönmez B
Clin Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 2(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 19668769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.
Ng SM; Ren M; Lindsley KB; Hawkins BS; Kuo IC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD013512. PubMed ID: 33765359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical biomicroscopy and retinoscopy findings of keratoconus in a Middle Eastern population.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 28879667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of ocular biometric parameters in keratoconic eyes relative to healthy myopic eyes.
Yağmur Kanra A; Uslu H
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; ():11206721211064481. PubMed ID: 34851216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the anatomic and refractive differences in hyperopic anisometropia.
Palamar M; Degirmenci C; Biler ED; Egrilmez S; Uretmen O; Yagci A
Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 36(6):881-886. PubMed ID: 26887566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Between Schiempflug Topography and Swept-Source Optic Coherence Based Optic Biometry in Keratoconus and Healthy Subjects.
Güçlü H; Akaray İ; Kaya S; Sattarpanah S; Çınar AC; Sakallıoğlu K; Korkmaz S; Gürlü V
Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Oct; 47(10):539-545. PubMed ID: 33813587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keratoconus-like tomographic changes in a case of recurrent interstitial keratitis.
Hanet MS; Zimpfer A; Lepper S; Seitz B
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4. PubMed ID: 29516199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results at 7years after cross-linking procedure in keratoconic patients.
Nicula C; Nicula D; Pop RN
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Sep; 40(7):535-541. PubMed ID: 28802685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam.
Bae GH; Kim JR; Kim CH; Lim DH; Chung ES; Chung TY
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):103-109.e1. PubMed ID: 24452012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlation between refraction and ocular biometry].
Touzeau O; Allouch C; Borderie V; Kopito R; Laroche L
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Apr; 26(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12843892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group.
Zadnik K; Barr JT; Gordon MO; Edrington TB
Cornea; 1996 Mar; 15(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 8925661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ocular dimensions of the Chinese adolescents with keratoconus.
Jian W; Shen Y; Chen Y; Tian M; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 29439700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
