These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30122891)

  • 61. Comparative analysis of two different types of intracorneal implants in keratoconus: A corneal tomographic study.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Belin MW; Piñero DP; Akbarzadeh R; Ambrósio R; Hosseini SR
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 33124461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Unilateral Keratoconus after Chronic Eye Rubbing by the Nondominant Hand.
    Bral N; Termote K
    Case Rep Ophthalmol; 2017; 8(3):558-561. PubMed ID: 29422858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
    Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Outcomes of a 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus: Results of a 6-month follow-up.
    Rocha GADN; Ferrara de Almeida Cunha P; Torquetti Costa L; Barbosa de Sousa L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 30541357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Preoperative biometry data of eyes with unilateral congenital cataract.
    Kun L; Szigeti A; Bausz M; Nagy ZZ; Maka E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 30243394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Predictors of Successful Outcome following Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Piñero DP; Akbarzadeh R; Moshirfar M; Bamdad S; Gazanchian M
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Jul; 44(7):707-715. PubMed ID: 30868919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A case of concomitant keratoconus and granular corneal dystrophy type II.
    Rho CR; Park JH; Jung YH; Kim MS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):314-6. PubMed ID: 24582869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Anatomic Predictive Factors of Acute Corneal Hydrops in Keratoconus: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Fuentes E; Sandali O; El Sanharawi M; Basli E; Hamiche T; Goemaere I; Borderie V; Bouheraoua N; Laroche L
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Aug; 122(8):1653-9. PubMed ID: 26045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparison of IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters in cataract patients.
    Jiang J; Pan X; Zhou M; Wang X; Zhu H; Li D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12770. PubMed ID: 35896713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Parental Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Keratoconus.
    Li J; Zhang BN; Jhanji V; Wang X; Li D; Du X
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 256():146-155. PubMed ID: 37567431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.
    Sen E; Inanc M; Elgin U; Yilmazbas P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):171-174. PubMed ID: 28108902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
    Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The use of ocular anatomical measurements using a rotating Scheimpflug camera to assist in the Esclera® scleral contact lens fitting process.
    Weber SL; Ambrósio R; Lipener C; Coral-Ghanem C; Hofling-Lima AL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26474924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Association between retinal vein occlusion, axial length and vitreous chamber depth measured by optical low coherence reflectometry.
    Szigeti A; Schneider M; Ecsedy M; Nagy ZZ; Récsán Z
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 15():45. PubMed ID: 25925557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.
    Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tañá-Sanz P; Tañá-Sanz S; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2023 Sep; 10(1):35. PubMed ID: 37653460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000.
    Liao X; Peng Y; Liu B; Tan QQ; Lan CJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3134. PubMed ID: 32081868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effectiveness and agreement of 3 optical biometers in measuring axial length in the eyes of patients with mature cataracts.
    Henriquez MA; Zúñiga R; Camino M; Camargo J; Ruiz-Montenegro K; Izquierdo L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 32379086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The Distinct Biometric Features of High Myopia Compared to Moderate Myopia.
    Chung HJ; Park CK
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Dec; 41(12):1580-1583. PubMed ID: 27336460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Association between Refractive Errors and Ocular Biometry in an Elderly Population.
    Hashemi H; Bouyeh A; Khabazkhoob M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jan; 100(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 36705717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.