These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30123172)

  • 1. The Object Orientation Effect in Exocentric Distances.
    Weller M; Takahashi K; Watanabe K; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1374. PubMed ID: 30123172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Influence of Human Body Orientation on Distance Judgments.
    Jung E; Takahashi K; Watanabe K; de la Rosa S; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():217. PubMed ID: 27014108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space.
    Kelly JW; Loomis JM; Beall AC
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 15222392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychological influences on distance estimation in a virtual reality environment.
    Takahashi K; Meilinger T; Watanabe K; Bülthoff HH
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():580. PubMed ID: 24065905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social scaling of extrapersonal space: target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities.
    Fini C; Brass M; Committeri G
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():50-6. PubMed ID: 25460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do reference surfaces influence exocentric pointing?
    Doumen MJ; Kappers AM; Koenderink JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 18423517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Did I Hit the Door? Effects of Self-Avatars and Calibration in a Person-Plus-Virtual-Object System on Perceived Frontal Passability in VR.
    Bhargava A; Venkatakrishnan R; Venkatakrishnan R; Solini H; Lucaites K; Robb AC; Pagano CC; Babu SV
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Dec; 28(12):4198-4210. PubMed ID: 34033542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can I Squeeze Through? Effects of Self-Avatars and Calibration in a Person-Plus-Virtual-Object System on Perceived Lateral Passability in VR.
    Bhargava A; Venkatakrishnan R; Venkatakrishnan R; Lucaites K; Solini H; Robb AC; Pagano CC; Babu SV
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Feb; PP():. PubMed ID: 37027739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging and the visual perception of exocentric distance.
    Norman JF; Adkins OC; Norman HF; Cox AG; Rogers CE
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):52-8. PubMed ID: 25720533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attenuation of alignment effect with exocentric encoding of location.
    Féry YA; Magnac R
    Perception; 2000; 29(7):789-99. PubMed ID: 11064801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple distance cues do not prevent systematic biases in reach to grasp movements.
    Kopiske KK; Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    Psychol Res; 2019 Feb; 83(1):147-158. PubMed ID: 30259095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the effects of altered avatars on perception-action in virtual reality.
    Day B; Ebrahimi E; Hartman LS; Pagano CC; Robb AC; Babu SV
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 30346194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual distance estimation in static compared to moving virtual scenes.
    Frenz H; Lappe M
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17120711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observer movement and size constancy.
    Combe E; Wexler M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20483845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A social interaction field model accurately identifies static and dynamic social groupings.
    Zhou C; Han M; Liang Q; Hu YF; Kuai SG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 3(8):847-855. PubMed ID: 31182793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.
    Day RH
    Science; 1972 Mar; 175(4028):1335-40. PubMed ID: 5059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-dimensional and multi-dimensional studies of the exocentric distance estimates in frontoparallel plane, virtual space, and outdoor open field.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Ribeiro-Filho NP; Da Silva JA
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 17120706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of the perception of sagittal motion.
    Gogel WC; Tietz JD
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 1635859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.