264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30124111)
1. Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.
Meister H; Rählmann S; Lemke U; Besser J
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518793255. PubMed ID: 30124111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.
Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.
Reinten I; De Ronde-Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler W
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014437. PubMed ID: 34027725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
