116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30125522)
1. Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with biopsy proven Gleason 6 prostate cancer? - analysis of the SEER database.
Daugherty M; Sedaghatpour D; Bratslavsky G; Shapiro O
Can J Urol; 2018 Aug; 25(4):9414-9420. PubMed ID: 30125522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score≤6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases.
Wenger H; Weiner AB; Razmaria A; Paner GP; Eggener SE
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e1-31.e6. PubMed ID: 27692833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement.
Godoy G; Chong KT; Cronin A; Vickers A; Laudone V; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Coleman JA
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21257258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Fournier G; Gajendran V; Leidich R; Lo R; Wolf JS; Jacob G; Nicolaisen G; Palmer K; Freiha F
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 7524237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Lymph Node Dissection in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of Survival and Early Postoperative Outcomes.
Mazzone E; Preisser F; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Bandini M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Shariat SF; Saad F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):541-548. PubMed ID: 31411992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.
Rahman S; Cosmatos H; Dave G; Williams S; Tome M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):906-10. PubMed ID: 21300478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the risk of pelvic node involvement among men with prostate cancer in the contemporary era.
Nguyen PL; Chen MH; Hoffman KE; Katz MS; D'Amico AV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 19286330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of preoperative plasma endoglin for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Karam JA; Svatek RS; Karakiewicz PI; Gallina A; Roehrborn CG; Slawin KM; Shariat SF
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(5):1418-22. PubMed ID: 18316564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective lymph node dissection for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Busch J; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Erber B; Klopf C; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
Urol Int; 2012; 88(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 22398510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Algorithm for selecting men for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy based on clinical risk factors in an Australian population.
Sengupta S; Weerakoon M; Sethi K; Ischia J; Webb DR
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():48-51. PubMed ID: 22458494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with a serum PSA<10ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?
Schumacher MC; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Fleischmann A; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 16632187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
