300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30125782)
1. `It makes sense and it works': Maternity care providers' perspectives on the feasibility of a group antenatal care model (Pregnancy Circles).
Hunter L; Da Motta G; McCourt C; Wiseman O; Rayment J; Haora P; Wiggins M; Harden A
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():56-63. PubMed ID: 30125782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy as an ideal time for intervention to address the complex needs of black and minority ethnic women: views of British midwives.
Aquino MR; Edge D; Smith DM
Midwifery; 2015 Mar; 31(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 25483209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The key components of a successful model of midwifery-led continuity of carer, without continuity at birth: findings from a qualitative implementation evaluation.
Dharni N; Essex H; Bryant MJ; Cronin de Chavez A; Willan K; Farrar D; Bywater T; Dickerson J;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 33711957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenges and opportunities for implementing group antenatal care ('Pregnancy Circles') as part of standard NHS maternity care: A co-designed qualitative study.
Wiseman O; Emmett L; Hickford G; Knight M; Lazar J; Yuill C; McCourt C
Midwifery; 2022 Jun; 109():103333. PubMed ID: 35405404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experiences and views of midwives performing antenatal cardiotocography in Dutch primary care: A qualitative study.
van der Pijl MSG; Tiel Groenestege EQ; Verhoeven CJM
Midwifery; 2019 May; 72():60-66. PubMed ID: 30784868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' experiences of father participation in maternity care at a large metropolitan health service in Australia.
Wynter K; Di Manno L; Watkins V; Rasmussen B; Macdonald JA
Midwifery; 2021 Oct; 101():103046. PubMed ID: 34098224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' experiences of referring obese women to either a community or home-based antenatal weight management service: Implications for service providers and midwifery practice.
Atkinson L; French DP; Ménage D; Olander EK
Midwifery; 2017 Jun; 49():102-109. PubMed ID: 27817977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing the MAMAACT intervention in Danish antenatal care: a qualitative study of non-Western immigrant women's and midwives' attitudes and experiences.
Johnsen H; Christensen U; Juhl M; Villadsen SF
Midwifery; 2021 Apr; 95():102935. PubMed ID: 33556845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'It's about developing a trustful relationship': A Realist Evaluation of midwives' relational competencies and confidence in a Danish antenatal psychosocial assessment programme.
Andersen CG; Thomsen LLH; Gram P; Overgaard C
Midwifery; 2023 Jul; 122():103675. PubMed ID: 37043942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwives' perspectives of continuity based working in the UK: A cross-sectional survey.
Taylor B; Cross-Sudworth F; Goodwin L; Kenyon S; MacArthur C
Midwifery; 2019 Aug; 75():127-137. PubMed ID: 31100484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing ethnic disparity in antenatal care: a qualitative evaluation of midwives' experiences with the MAMAACT intervention.
Johnsen H; Ghavami Kivi N; Morrison CH; Juhl M; Christensen U; Villadsen SF
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 32075593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using a quality care framework to evaluate user and provider experiences of maternity care: A comparative study.
Symon A; McFadden A; White M; Fraser K; Cummins A
Midwifery; 2019 Jun; 73():17-25. PubMed ID: 30856527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Better maternity care pathways in pregnancies after stillbirth or neonatal death: a feasibility study.
Mills TA; Roberts SA; Camacho E; Heazell AEP; Massey RN; Melvin C; Newport R; Smith DM; Storey CO; Taylor W; Lavender T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Aug; 22(1):634. PubMed ID: 35948884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antenatal care for Somali-born women in Sweden: Perspectives from mothers, fathers and midwives.
Ahrne M; Schytt E; Andersson E; Small R; Adan A; Essén B; Byrskog U
Midwifery; 2019 Jul; 74():107-115. PubMed ID: 30953966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Organisational barriers to implementing the MAMAACT intervention to improve maternity care for non-Western immigrant women: A qualitative evaluation.
Johnsen H; Christensen U; Juhl M; Villadsen SF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Nov; 111():103742. PubMed ID: 32992080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A continuity of care programme for women at risk of preterm birth in the UK: Process evaluation of a hybrid randomised controlled pilot trial.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Hull LH; Coxon K; Bollard M; Cross P; Seed PT; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0279695. PubMed ID: 36634125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth.
Cheyne H; Abhyankar P; McCourt C
Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1110-21. PubMed ID: 23968777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, Australia.
Teate A; Leap N; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2013 Mar; 26(1):e31-6. PubMed ID: 22926224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is constituted and experienced by Danish midwives.
Jepsen I; Mark E; Nøhr EA; Foureur M; Sørensen EE
Midwifery; 2016 May; 36():61-9. PubMed ID: 27106945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
