These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

795 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30126045)

  • 21. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon.
    Patel VR; Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Palmer KJ; Rocco B; Sivaraman A; Coughlin G
    BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 20707793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?
    Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    KleinJan GH; Sikorska K; Korne CM; Brouwer OR; Buckle T; Tillier C; van der Roest RCM; de Jong J; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 30178300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Feng T; Heulitt G; Lee JJ; Liao M; Li HF; Porter JR
    BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32521115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
    Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
    Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
    Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
    Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
    Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
    Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Checcucci E; De Luca S; Passera R; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 28753822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
    Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Complications and outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience.
    Yuh B; Ruel N; Muldrew S; Mejia R; Novara G; Kawachi M; Wilson T
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 24314031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preclinical and clinical evidence for using perinatal tissue allografts in nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy to hasten recovery of functional outcomes: a literature review.
    Perry AG; Kahn A; Mercuri J; Rini K; Chang J; Pathak RA
    BMC Urol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):208. PubMed ID: 39342266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Morbidity and Functional Outcomes from a Large Multicenter Series of Open versus Robotic Approaches.
    Gontero P; Marra G; Alessio P; Filippini C; Oderda M; Munoz F; Linares E; Sanchez-Salas R; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P; Goonewardene S; Popert R; Cahill D; Gillatt D; Persad R; Palou J; Joniau S; Piechaud T; Morlacco A; Vidit S; Rouprêt M; De La Taille A; Albisinni S; Gandaglia G; Mottrie A; Joshi S; Fiscus G; Berger A; Aron M; Van Der Poel H; Tilki D; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; Leung G; Davis J; Karnes RJ;
    J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):725-731. PubMed ID: 31075058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.
    Shin TY; Lee YS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17595. PubMed ID: 33077779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.