These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30126385)

  • 1. Validation of the Liverpool Elbow Score for evaluation of elbow stiffness.
    Sun Z; Fan C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):302. PubMed ID: 30126385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a new elbow-specific scoring system for patients with elbow stiffness: the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score.
    Sun Z; Liu W; Wang W; Fan C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Feb; 28(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 30472055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the Liverpool Elbow Score as a postal questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total elbow arthroplasty.
    Ashmore AM; Gozzard C; Blewitt N
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(3 Suppl):S55-8. PubMed ID: 17169590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability.
    Turchin DC; Beaton DE; Richards RR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Feb; 80(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 9486721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of the Liverpool Elbow Score in elbow arthroplasty.
    Vishwanathan K; Alizadehkhaiyat O; Kemp GJ; Frostick SP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Mar; 22(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 23312819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Liverpool Elbow Score, patient-answered section: Cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Turkish version.
    Şavkın R; Büker N; Şimşek Ş
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Dec; 50():102256. PubMed ID: 33069940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
    The B; Reininga IH; El Moumni M; Eygendaal D
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1380-94. PubMed ID: 23790677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.
    Longo UG; Franceschi F; Loppini M; Maffulli N; Denaro V
    Br Med Bull; 2008; 87():131-61. PubMed ID: 18539627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Elbow arthroscopy in the surgical treatment of post-traumatic changes of the elbow joint].
    Meluzinová P; Kopp L; Edelmann K; Obruba P; Avenarius J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 25651295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric properties of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.
    Celik D
    Rheumatol Int; 2015 Jun; 35(6):1015-20. PubMed ID: 25549600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Validation of the German version of the Oxford Elbow Score : A cross-sectional study].
    Marquardt J; Schöttker-Königer T; Schäfer A
    Orthopade; 2016 Aug; 45(8):695-700. PubMed ID: 27385387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version.
    Beauchemin G; MacDermid JC; Bourduas K; Poirier MF; Gaudelli C; Rouleau DM
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 25936242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of different glucose metabolism status on clinical outcomes of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.
    Sun Z; Xiong H; Fan C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1072-1077. PubMed ID: 29555120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of an elbow score.
    Sathyamoorthy P; Kemp GJ; Rawal A; Rayner V; Frostick SP
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2004 Nov; 43(11):1434-40. PubMed ID: 15304676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire.
    Farazdaghi MR; Mansoori A; Vosoughi O; Kordi Yoosefinejad A
    Rheumatol Int; 2017 May; 37(5):743-750. PubMed ID: 27904948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.
    Cusick MC; Bonnaig NS; Azar FM; Mauck BM; Smith RA; Throckmorton TW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1146-50. PubMed ID: 24656392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for elbow disorders.
    Beirer M; Friese H; Lenich A; Crönlein M; Sandmann GH; Biberthaler P; Kirchhoff C; Siebenlist S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jul; 25(7):2230-2236. PubMed ID: 25982625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a novel questionnaire for self-determination of the range of motion of wrist and elbow.
    Schnetzke M; Schüler S; Keil H; Aytac S; Studier-Fischer S; Grützner PA; Guehring T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():312. PubMed ID: 27457712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative responsiveness of four elbow scoring instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    de Boer YA; Hazes JM; Winia PC; Brand R; Rozing PM
    J Rheumatol; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2616-23. PubMed ID: 11764206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.
    Kim SJ; Basur MS; Park CK; Chong S; Kang YG; Kim MJ; Jeong JS; Kim TK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 475(6):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 28265885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.