BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30127712)

  • 1. A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices.
    Jas M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Leppäkangas J; Taulu S; Hämäläinen M; Gramfort A
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():530. PubMed ID: 30127712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Goj R; Jas M; Brooks T; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen M
    Front Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 7():267. PubMed ID: 24431986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NeuroPycon: An open-source python toolbox for fast multi-modal and reproducible brain connectivity pipelines.
    Meunier D; Pascarella A; Altukhov D; Jas M; Combrisson E; Lajnef T; Bertrand-Dubois D; Hadid V; Alamian G; Alves J; Barlaam F; Saive AL; Dehgan A; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117020. PubMed ID: 32522662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group Analysis in MNE-Python of Evoked Responses from a Tactile Stimulation Paradigm: A Pipeline for Reproducibility at Every Step of Processing, Going from Individual Sensor Space Representations to an across-Group Source Space Representation.
    Andersen LM
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():6. PubMed ID: 29403349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MEG Source Imaging and Group Analysis Using VBMEG.
    Takeda Y; Suzuki K; Kawato M; Yamashita O
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():241. PubMed ID: 30967756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multivariate matching pursuit in optimal Gabor dictionaries: theory and software with interface for EEG/MEG via Svarog.
    Kuś R; Różański PT; Durka PJ
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Sep; 12():94. PubMed ID: 24059247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
    Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [MEG]PLS: A pipeline for MEG data analysis and partial least squares statistics.
    Cheung MJ; Kovačević N; Fatima Z; Mišić B; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):181-193. PubMed ID: 26318525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
    Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FLUX: A pipeline for MEG analysis.
    Ferrante O; Liu L; Minarik T; Gorska U; Ghafari T; Luo H; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jun; 253():119047. PubMed ID: 35276363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From BIDS-Formatted EEG Data to Sensor-Space Group Results: A Fully Reproducible Workflow With EEGLAB and LIMO EEG.
    Pernet CR; Martinez-Cancino R; Truong D; Makeig S; Delorme A
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():610388. PubMed ID: 33519362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CoSMoMVPA: Multi-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Neuroimaging Data in Matlab/GNU Octave.
    Oosterhof NN; Connolly AC; Haxby JV
    Front Neuroinform; 2016; 10():27. PubMed ID: 27499741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED).
    Robbins K; Truong D; Appelhoff S; Delorme A; Makeig S
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118766. PubMed ID: 34848298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.