134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128329)
1. Modeling visual search behavior of breast radiologists using a deep convolution neural network.
Mall S; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jul; 5(3):035502. PubMed ID: 30128329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.
Mall S; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):746-760. PubMed ID: 31410677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fixated and Not Fixated Regions of Mammograms: A Higher-Order Statistical Analysis of Visual Search Behavior.
Mall S; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 28139426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual search in breast imaging.
Gandomkar Z; Mello-Thoms C
Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20190057. PubMed ID: 31287719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. iCAP: An Individualized Model Combining Gaze Parameters and Image-Based Features to Predict Radiologists' Decisions While Reading Mammograms.
Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Ryder W; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 May; 36(5):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 28055858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recurrence quantification analysis of radiologists' scanpaths when interpreting mammograms.
Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3052-3062. PubMed ID: 29694675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.
Tourassi G; Voisin S; Paquit V; Krupinski E
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 23788627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A collaborative computer aided diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning.
Khosravan N; Celik H; Turkbey B; Jones EC; Wood B; Bagci U
Med Image Anal; 2019 Jan; 51():101-115. PubMed ID: 30399507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of factors influencing radiologists' visual search behaviour.
Ganesan A; Alakhras M; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 62(6):747-757. PubMed ID: 30198628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?
Wolfe JM; Wu CC; Li J; Suresh SB
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 Jul; 8(4):045501. PubMed ID: 34277890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-mounted versus remote eye tracking of radiologists searching for breast cancer: a comparison.
Mello-Thoms C; Britton C; Abrams G; Hakim C; Shah R; Hardesty L; Maitz G; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 16428056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can eye-tracking metrics be used to better pair radiologists in a mammogram reading task?
Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Kozuch E; Mello-Thoms C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4844-4856. PubMed ID: 30168153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RAMS: Remote and automatic mammogram screening.
Cogan T; Cogan M; Tamil L
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Apr; 107():18-29. PubMed ID: 30771549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation and initial experience with an interactive eye-tracking system for measuring radiologists' visual search in diagnostic tasks using volumetric CT images.
Gong H; Hsieh SS; Holmes DR; Cook DA; Inoue A; Bartlett DJ; Baffour F; Takahashi H; Leng S; Yu L; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12031():. PubMed ID: 35721454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.
Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
