137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128560)
1. Comparison of Artificial Saliva vs Saline Solution on Rate of Suture Degradation in Oropharyngeal Surgery.
Briddell JW; Riexinger LE; Graham J; Ebenstein DM
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Sep; 144(9):824-830. PubMed ID: 30128560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Fluoridated Mouthwashes on Strength and Durability of Three Different Synthetic Absorbable Suturing Materials: An
Awasthi N; Ramanna PK; Lahiri B; Das A; Ravi RV; Mishra D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Apr; 23(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 35945837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAPROSYN*, another major advance in synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
Pineros-Fernandez A; Drake DB; Rodeheaver PA; Moody DL; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(5):359-68. PubMed ID: 15479151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of saliva and oral intake on the tensile properties of sutures: an experimental study.
Ferguson RE; Schuler K; Thornton BP; Vasconez HC; Rinker B
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Mar; 58(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 17471130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study.
Vasanthan A; Satheesh K; Hoopes W; Lucaci P; Williams K; Rapley J
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):618-24. PubMed ID: 19335082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-vitro evaluation of commonly used beverages on tensile strength of different suture materials used in dental surgeries.
Abullais SS; Alqahtani NA; Alkhulban RM; Alamer SH; Khan AA; Pimple S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(48):e19831. PubMed ID: 33235053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of saline conditions on the tensile strength of ophthalmic sutures.
Brauner SC; Berry JL; Pye J; Lee EG; Rhee DJ
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21117584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elasticity and breaking strength of synthetic suture materials incubated in various equine physiological and pathological solutions.
Kearney CM; Buckley CT; Jenner F; Moissonnier P; Brama PA
Equine Vet J; 2014 Jul; 46(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 24004343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inflammatory synovial fluid and absorbable suture strength.
Barber FA; Gurwitz GS
Arthroscopy; 1988; 4(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 3233117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of 7-0 Polyglactin 910 suture in cataract surgery.
Blaydes JE
Ophthalmic Surg; 1975; 6(4):99-104. PubMed ID: 1107925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of barbed and smooth sutures for ovine cesarean delivery.
Greenberg JA; Walden S; Hammer CM; Grazul-Bilska AT; Vonnahme KA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 113(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 21457976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the Impact of Commonly used Beverages on Durability of Suture Materials: An
Das A; Lahiri B; Singh PK; Kumari D; Mishra D; Bhushan P
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 1):S447-S450. PubMed ID: 37654402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical performance of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable sutures.
Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 153(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 6272438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breaking strength and elasticity of synthetic absorbable suture materials incubated in phosphate-buffered saline solution, milk, and milk contaminated with Streptococcus agalactiae.
Nichols S; Anderson DE
Am J Vet Res; 2007 Apr; 68(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 17397302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Chlorhexidine and Listerine® Mouthwashes on the Tensile Strength of Selected Absorbable Sutures: An
Alsarhan M; Alnofaie H; Ateeq R; Almahdy A
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8531706. PubMed ID: 30539024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the breaking strength and stiffness of polydioxanone (sizes 2, 7) and polyglactin 910 (sizes 3, 6) in the equine linea alba.
Fierheller EE; Wilson DG
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15720592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
