69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128685)
1. Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.
Wagner A; Wittig U; Leitner L; Vielgut I; Hauer G; Ortmaier R; Leithner A; Sadoghi P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 May; 144(5):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 38570357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilizing Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Data.
Osan JK; Harris IA; Harries D; Peng Y; Yates PJ; Jones CW
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Jul; 39(7):1692-1698. PubMed ID: 38244637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Polished Cobalt-Chrome Baseplate is not Associated With a Lower Revision Rate Than Matt Titanium in a Single Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant System With Identical Baseplate Design.
Zhou Y; Harries D; Stoney JD
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Apr; 39(4):896-903. PubMed ID: 37852451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Constraint degree in revision total knee replacement: a registry study on 1432 patients.
Digennaro V; Brunello M; Di Martino A; Panciera A; Bordini B; Bulzacki Bogucki BD; Ferri R; Cecchin D; Faldini C
Musculoskelet Surg; 2024 Jun; 108(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 37237144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers.
Leitner L; Hauer G; Rasic L; Clar C; Leithner A; Sadoghi P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Feb; 144(2):855-859. PubMed ID: 37843609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Utilization of Press-Fit Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Evenly Distributed: A National Registry Review.
Jabbouri SS; Jones B; Alemayehu G; Jimenez E; Mullen K; Bernstein J
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Jun; 32(11):495-502. PubMed ID: 38470986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Lack of Generalizability-Total Knee Demographics in the Active Duty Population.
Olsen AA; Junge JM; Booth G; Abraham VM; Balazs GC; Goldman AH
Mil Med; 2024 May; 189(5-6):e1161-e1165. PubMed ID: 37966515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Is the Most Appropriate Comparator to Use in Assessing the Comparative Performance of Primary Total Knee Prostheses? A Registry-Based Study.
Ghadirinejad K; Graves S; de Steiger R; Pratt N; Solomon LB; Taylor M; Hashemi R
Arthroplast Today; 2024 Jun; 27():101344. PubMed ID: 38524151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of patient and prosthesis characteristics on common reasons for total knee replacement revision: a registry study of 36,626 revision cases from Australia, Sweden, and USA.
Lewis PL; W-Dahl A; Robertsson O; Prentice HA; Graves SE
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jul; 93():623-633. PubMed ID: 35819795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Okafor C; Hodgkinson B; Nghiem S; Vertullo C; Byrnes J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):706. PubMed ID: 34407779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost of Revision Total Knee Replacement: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Okafor CE; Nghiem S; Vertullo C; Byrnes J
Pharmacoecon Open; 2021 Jun; 5(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 33237525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized registry as a potential tool for surveillance and management of complex bone and joint infections in France: French registry of complex bone and joint infections.
Lemaignen A; Grammatico-Guillon L; Astagneau P; Marmor S; Ferry T; Jolivet-Gougeon A; Senneville E; Bernard L
Bone Joint Res; 2020 Oct; 9(10):635-644. PubMed ID: 33101653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Twelve-Year Outcomes of an Oxinium Total Knee Replacement Compared with the Same Cobalt-Chromium Design: An Analysis of 17,577 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Vertullo CJ; Lewis PL; Graves S; Kelly L; Lorimer M; Myers P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 28196029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Prosthetic Design and Polyethylene Type on the Risk of Revision for Infection in Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 336,997 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Vertullo CJ; de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Lorimer M; Peng Y; Graves SE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Dec; 100(23):2033-2040. PubMed ID: 30516626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International primary knee arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports.
Sidhu A; Sheridan GA; Greidanus NV; Neufeld ME; Howard LC; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Oct; 33(7):2729-2735. PubMed ID: 36947314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of National Joint Registries to Evaluate a New Knee Arthroplasty Design.
Vasarhelyi EM; Petis SM
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):413-416. PubMed ID: 31629622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimum prosthesis combination of low-risk total knee arthroplasty options in all five primary categories of design results in a 60% reduction in revision risk: a registry analysis of 482,373 prostheses.
Vertullo CJ; Graves SE; Peng Y; Lewis PL
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 May; 27(5):1418-1426. PubMed ID: 30128685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
