263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128754)
1. Ulnar Artery Catheterization: Is This Our Second Access Site or Is It Still Femoral?
Vidovich MI
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2018 Aug; 20(10):91. PubMed ID: 30128754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review.
Kar S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 28766859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez R; Zaky F; Ekmejian A; Curtis E; Lee A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 29388387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic review of alternative access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: Dorsal distal radial and ulnar artery catheterization.
Kar S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 94(5):706-713. PubMed ID: 31328885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization: The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial.
Pancholy SB; Bernat I; Bertrand OF; Patel TM
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):1992-1999. PubMed ID: 27712733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: the multicenter SWITCH registry.
Agostoni P; Zuffi A; Faurie B; Tosi P; Samim M; Belkacemi A; Voskuil M; Stella PR; Romagnoli E; Biondi-Zoccai G
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24063926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel technique for simultaneous hemostasis of ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery access sites.
Roberts JS; Niu J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 91(5):901-904. PubMed ID: 29044931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
Sandoval Y; Burke MN; Lobo AS; Lips DL; Seto AH; Chavez I; Sorajja P; Abu-Fadel MS; Wang Y; Poulouse A; Gössl M; Mooney M; Traverse J; Tierney D; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2233-2241. PubMed ID: 29169493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trans-ulnar catheterization and coronary interventions: From technique to outcomes.
Sattur S; Singh M; Kaluski E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Jun; 18(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 28216229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized radial approach reduces access site complications: a prospective observational registry.
Markovic S; Imhof A; Kunze M; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jan; 26(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 25211653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Targeting the safe zone: A quality improvement project to reduce vascular access complications.
Mignatti A; Friedmann P; Slovut DP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28296143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.
Feldkamp T; Luedemann M; Spehlmann ME; Freitag-Wolf S; Gaensbacher J; Schulte K; Bajrovic A; Hinzmann D; Hippe HJ; Kunzendorf U; Frey N; Luedde M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 107(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28939956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of coronary interventions in a single centre and comparison of specific differences between radial and femoral access.
Rychlik J; Hornacek I; Tejc M; Petrikovits E; Klimsa Z
Acta Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 30193077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transulnar approach as an alternative to transradial approach in non-coronary intervention: safety, feasibility and technical factors.
Zybulewski A; Edwards M; Kim E; Nowakowski FS; Patel R; Tabori N; Lookstein R; Fischman A
J Vasc Access; 2017 May; 18(3):250-254. PubMed ID: 28430314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technique of delayed endovascular hemostatic closure for large bore vascular access site: A case series.
Pourdjabbar A; Reeves RR; Mahmud E; Ang L; Patel MP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 27743820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pseudoaneurysm a rare complication of transradial cardiac catheterization: a case report.
Bhat T; Bhat H; Teli S; Rajiv B; Akhtar M; Gala B
Vascular; 2013 Oct; 21(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 23508390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
