These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

659 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128817)

  • 21. Comparison of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with angiography-based quantitative flow ratio.
    Stähli BE; Erbay A; Steiner J; Klotsche J; Mochmann HC; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Leistner DM
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 279():12-17. PubMed ID: 30545620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.
    Watarai M; Otsuka M; Yazaki K; Inagaki Y; Kahata M; Kumagai A; Inoue K; Koganei H; Enta K; Ishii Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31243612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Offline Assessment of the Quantitative Flow Ratio: Is it Useful in Clinical Practice?
    de Moura Santos L; Borges Carvalho W; Ribeiro MH; Medeiros Lopes MAAA; da Silva EF; Fukushima JT; Abizaid AAC; Campos CM
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 34(8):E620-E626. PubMed ID: 35920731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the SYNTAX II Trial: Feasibility, Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio, and Clinical Prognostic Value of Functional SYNTAX Score Derived From Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With 3-Vessel Disease.
    Asano T; Katagiri Y; Chang CC; Kogame N; Chichareon P; Takahashi K; Modolo R; Tenekecioglu E; Collet C; Jonker H; Appleby C; Zaman A; van Mieghem N; Uren N; Zueco J; Piek JJ; Reiber JHC; Farooq V; Escaned J; Banning AP; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(3):259-270. PubMed ID: 30409759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio.
    Kanno Y; Sugiyama T; Hoshino M; Usui E; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):E238-E247. PubMed ID: 32012438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Virtual Resting Pd/Pa From Coronary Angiography and Blood Flow Modelling: Diagnostic Performance Against Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Papafaklis MI; Muramatsu T; Ishibashi Y; Bourantas CV; Fotiadis DI; Brilakis ES; Garcia-Garcia HM; Escaned J; Serruys PW; Michalis LK
    Heart Lung Circ; 2018 Mar; 27(3):377-380. PubMed ID: 28506646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus.
    Smit JM; El Mahdiui M; van Rosendael AR; Jukema JW; Koning G; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 May; 123(10):1722-1728. PubMed ID: 30853082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic performance and clinical implications for enhancing a hybrid quantitative flow ratio-FFR revascularization decision-making strategy.
    Peper J; van Hamersvelt RW; Rensing BJWM; van Kuijk JP; Voskuil M; Berg JMT; Schaap J; Kelder JC; Grobbee DE; Leiner T; Swaans MJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6425. PubMed ID: 33742077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Angiography-derived functional assessment of left main coronary stenoses.
    Yuasa S; Lauri FM; Mejia-Renteria H; Liontou C; Lee HJ; Tanigaki T; Nakayama M; Warisawa T; Uchiyama T; Matsuo H; Davies JE; Sato T; Escaned J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 May; 101(6):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 36934387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve.
    Arashi H; Yamaguchi J; Nakazawa M; Otsuki H; Haruki S; Nakao M; Kamishima K; Jujo K; Minami Y; Takagi A; Ogawa H; Hagiwara N
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Apr; 32(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27236812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law.
    Tu S; Ding D; Chang Y; Li C; Wijns W; Xu B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97 Suppl 2():1040-1047. PubMed ID: 33660921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.
    Kwon W; Choi KH; Lee SH; Hong D; Shin D; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Joh HS; Kyu Park T; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Jeong MH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Lee JM;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 17(5):e013844. PubMed ID: 38771911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis.
    Kolli KK; van de Hoef TP; Effat MA; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Leesar MA; Imran A; Piek JJ; Helmy TA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 26424295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Detecting the Functional Significance of Coronary Stenosis.
    Zuo W; Yang M; Chen Y; Xie A; Chen L; Ma G
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5828931. PubMed ID: 31119175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation.
    Li Z; Zhan J; Han J; Fu G; Jin C
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2022 Feb; 23(2):59. PubMed ID: 35229550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner.
    Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J
    Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) estimated retrospectively by conventional radiation saving X-ray angiography.
    Jin C; Ramasamy A; Safi H; Kilic Y; Tufaro V; Bajaj R; Fu G; Mathur A; Bourantas CV; Baumbach A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 May; 37(5):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 33454897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
    Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.
    Spitaleri G; Tebaldi M; Biscaglia S; Westra J; Brugaletta S; Erriquez A; Passarini G; Brieda A; Leone AM; Picchi A; Ielasi A; Girolamo DD; Trani C; Ferrari R; Reiber JHC; Valgimigli M; Sabatè M; Campo G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(2):e006023. PubMed ID: 29449325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.