These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30128889)

  • 1. Do complex span and content-embedded working memory tasks predict unique variance in inductive reasoning?
    Zamary A; Rawson KA; Was CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2546-2558. PubMed ID: 30128889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Content-embedded tasks beat complex span for predicting comprehension.
    Was CA; Rawson KA; Bailey H; Dunlosky J
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21637942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: the gap is not that deep.
    Schmiedek F; Hildebrandt A; Lövdén M; Wilhelm O; Lindenberger U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 19586272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage.
    Unsworth N; Redick TS; Heitz RP; Broadway JM; Engle RW
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):635-54. PubMed ID: 19536691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A task is a task is a task: putting complex span, n-back, and other working memory indicators in psychometric context.
    Schmiedek F; Lövdén M; Lindenberger U
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1475. PubMed ID: 25566149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the forgetting mechanisms in working memory: evidence from a reasoning span test.
    Saito S; Jarrold C; Riby DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1401-19. PubMed ID: 19058051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory complex span tasks and fluid intelligence: Does the positional structure of the task matter?
    Debraise M; Gauvrit N; Mathy F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):238-248. PubMed ID: 33051826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory and high-level cognition in children: An analysis of timing and accuracy in complex span tasks.
    Gordon R; Smith-Spark JH; Newton EJ; Henry LA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Mar; 191():104736. PubMed ID: 31770682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working Memory and Reasoning Benefit from Different Modes of Large-scale Brain Dynamics in Healthy Older Adults.
    Lebedev AV; Nilsson J; Lövdén M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):1033-1046. PubMed ID: 29561235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different strategies in solving series completion inductive reasoning problems: an fMRI and computational study.
    Liang P; Jia X; Taatgen NA; Zhong N; Li K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Aug; 93(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 24841995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is working memory capacity a causal factor in fluid intelligence?
    Burgoyne AP; Hambrick DZ; Altmann EM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1333-1339. PubMed ID: 31012079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus.
    de Chantal PL; Newman IR; Thompson V; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):655-671. PubMed ID: 31792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoning in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Simpson J; Cove J; Fineberg N; Msetfi RM; J Ball L
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2007 Nov; 46(Pt 4):397-411. PubMed ID: 17651534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syntactic Recursion Facilitates and Working Memory Predicts Recursive Theory of Mind.
    Arslan B; Hohenberger A; Verbrugge R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169510. PubMed ID: 28072823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The composite complex span: French validation of a short working memory task.
    Gonthier C; Thomassin N; Roulin JL
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25669761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability.
    Leather CV; Henry LA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1994 Aug; 58(1):88-111. PubMed ID: 8064220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple and Complex Working Memory Tasks Allow Similar Benefits of Information Compression.
    Mathy F; Chekaf M; Cowan N
    J Cogn; 2018 May; 1(1):31. PubMed ID: 31517204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis.
    Bailey H; Dunlosky J; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1383-90. PubMed ID: 19015498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of complex working memory span task administration methods on prediction of higher level cognition and metacognitive control of response times.
    McCabe DP
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):868-82. PubMed ID: 20921100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.