BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30130263)

  • 1. Cost and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Coronary Surgery Using Robotic Technology.
    Pasrija C; Kon ZN; Ghoreishi M; Lehr EJ; Gammie JS; Griffith BP; Bonatti J; Taylor BS
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 30130263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Analysis of Perioperative and Mid-Term Results of TECAB and MIDCAB for Revascularization of Anterior Wall.
    Kofler M; Schachner T; Reinstadler SJ; Stastny L; Dumfarth J; Wiedemann D; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Bonatti J; Bonaros N
    Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(3):207-213. PubMed ID: 28542076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
    Cheng N; Gao CQ; Yang M; Wu Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Coronary Revascularization is Feasible and Safe: 10-year Single-Center Experience.
    Al-Mulla AW; Sarhan HHT; Abdalghafoor T; Al-Balushi S; El Kahlout MI; Tbishat L; Alwaheidi DF; Maksoud M; Omar AS; Ashraf S; Kindawi A
    Heart Views; 2022; 23(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 36605928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there an optimal minimally invasive technique for left anterior descending coronary artery bypass?
    Jegaden O; Wautot F; Sassard T; Szymanik I; Shafy A; Lapeze J; Farhat F
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 6():37. PubMed ID: 21439055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of distal coronary artery anastomotic devices in MIDCAB and TECAB surgery.
    Soylu E; Harling L; Ashrafian H; Attaran S; Athanasiou C; Punjabi PP; Casula R; Athanasiou T
    Perfusion; 2016 Oct; 31(7):537-43. PubMed ID: 26590391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of the current evidence.
    Leonard JR; Rahouma M; Abouarab AA; Schwann AN; Scuderi G; Lau C; Guy TS; Demetres M; Puskas JD; Taggart DP; Girardi LN; Gaudino M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 261():42-46. PubMed ID: 29657055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up.
    Sabashnikov A; Patil NP; Weymann A; Mohite PN; Zych B; García Sáez D; Popov AF; Wahlers T; Wittwer T; Wippermann J; Amrani M; Trimlett R; Simon AR; Pepper J; Bahrami T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 46(4):e48-55. PubMed ID: 25064052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced hybrid closed chest revascularization: an innovative strategy for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease†.
    Bonaros N; Schachner T; Kofler M; Lehr E; Lee J; Vesely M; Zimrin D; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Bonatti J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 46(6):e94-102; discussion e102. PubMed ID: 25256825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Halkos ME; Liberman HA; Devireddy C; Walker P; Finn AV; Jaber W; Guyton RA; Puskas JD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 24172691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes from the Past two Decades.
    Göbölös L; Ramahi J; Obeso A; Bartel T; Hogan M; Traina M; Edris A; Hasan F; Banna ME; Tuzcu EM; Bonatti J
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Feb; 14(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 30848708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Arom KV; Emery RW; Flavin TF; Petersen RJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 68(4):1562-6. PubMed ID: 10543570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention of the LAD: costs and long-term outcome.
    Merkle J; Zeriouh M; Sabashnikov A; Azizov F; Hohmann C; Weber C; Eghbalzadeh K; Said Y; Wahlers T; Michels G
    Perfusion; 2019 May; 34(4):323-329. PubMed ID: 30574851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Comparison between Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery and Conventional Bypass Grafting Surgery in Proximal LAD Lesion.
    Ezelsoy M; Caynak B; Bayram M; Oral K; Bayramoglu Z; Sagbas E; Aytekın V; Akpınar B
    Heart Surg Forum; 2015 Apr; 18(2):E042-6. PubMed ID: 25924029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Multivessel Endoscopic Coronary Bypass: Impact of a Beating-Heart Approach With Connectors.
    Balkhy HH; Nisivaco S; Kitahara H; McCrorey M; Patel B
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Jul; 108(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 30690021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization.
    Holzhey DM; Jacobs S; Mochalski M; Merk D; Walther T; Mohr FW; Falk V
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1856-60. PubMed ID: 19021994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consequences of Hybrid Procedure Addition to Robotic-Assisted Direct Coronary Artery Bypass.
    Khaliel F; Giambruno V; Chu MWA; Sridhar K; Teefy P; Kiaii BB
    Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 28338553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Is totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting associated with superior outcomes in patients with isolated left anterior descending disease?'.
    Manuel L; Fong LS; Wolfenden H; Bassin L
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2020 Sep; 57():264-267. PubMed ID: 32884744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasons for Conversion and Adverse Intraoperative Events in Robotically Enhanced Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization.
    van der Merwe J; Casselman F; Vermeulen Y; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Van Praet F
    Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(3):251-260. PubMed ID: 32434406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmental myocardial wall motion during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using open and endoscopic surgical techniques.
    Mierdl S; Byhahn C; Lischke V; Aybek T; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Dogan S; Viehmeyer S; Kessler P; Westphal K
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Feb; 100(2):306-314. PubMed ID: 15673848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.