296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30131112)
1. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Bone; 2013 Jan; 52(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 22985891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femur strength predictions by nonlinear homogenized voxel finite element models reflect the microarchitecture of the femoral neck.
Iori G; Peralta L; Reisinger A; Heyer F; Wyers C; van den Bergh J; Pahr D; Raum K
Med Eng Phys; 2020 May; 79():60-66. PubMed ID: 32291201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel registration-based methodology for prediction of trabecular bone fabric from clinical QCT: A comprehensive analysis.
Chandran V; Reyes M; Zysset P
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187874. PubMed ID: 29176881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphology based anisotropic finite element models of the proximal femur validated with experimental data.
Enns-Bray WS; Ariza O; Gilchrist S; Widmer Soyka RP; Vogt PJ; Palsson H; Boyd SK; Guy P; Cripton PA; Ferguson SJ; Helgason B
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1339-1347. PubMed ID: 27641660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast estimation of Colles' fracture load of the distal section of the radius by homogenized finite element analysis based on HR-pQCT.
Hosseini HS; Dünki A; Fabech J; Stauber M; Vilayphiou N; Pahr D; Pretterklieber M; Wandel J; Rietbergen BV; Zysset PK
Bone; 2017 Apr; 97():65-75. PubMed ID: 28069517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Op Den Buijs J; McEligot S; Dai Y; Entwistle RC; Salas C; Melton LJ; Bennet KE; Khosla S; Amin S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):742-55. PubMed ID: 21052839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Salas C; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 25442008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical analysis of the inter-individual variations of the bone shape, volume fraction and fabric and their correlations in the proximal femur.
Taghizadeh E; Chandran V; Reyes M; Zysset P; Büchler P
Bone; 2017 Oct; 103():252-261. PubMed ID: 28732775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
Faisal TR; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir GS; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
Bone; 2013 Nov; 57(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 23907032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
