229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30131168)
1. Lessons learned in methods and analyses for pragmatic studies.
Eckardt P; Erlanger AE
Nurs Outlook; 2018 Sep; 66(5):446-454. PubMed ID: 30131168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Dal-Ré R; Janiaud P; Ioannidis JPA
BMC Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 29615035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.
Godwin M; Ruhland L; Casson I; MacDonald S; Delva D; Birtwhistle R; Lam M; Seguin R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Dec; 3():28. PubMed ID: 14690550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pragmatism in practice: lessons learned during screening and enrollment for a randomised controlled trial in rural northern Ethiopia.
Molla M; Negussie H; Ngari M; Kivaya E; Njuguna P; Enqueselassie F; Berkley JA; Davey G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 29514613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management.
Meinecke AK; Welsing P; Kafatos G; Burke D; Trelle S; Kubin M; Nachbaur G; Egger M; Zuidgeest M;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():13-22. PubMed ID: 28716504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research.
Gaglio B; Phillips SM; Heurtin-Roberts S; Sanchez MA; Glasgow RE
Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():96. PubMed ID: 25163664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explanatory Versus Pragmatic Trials: An Essential Concept in Study Design and Interpretation.
Merali Z; Wilson JR
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Nov; 30(9):404-406. PubMed ID: 29049130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medicines: Considerations for external control arms.
Burcu M; Dreyer NA; Franklin JM; Blum MD; Critchlow CW; Perfetto EM; Zhou W
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1228-1235. PubMed ID: 32162381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements.
Nieuwenhuis JB; Irving E; Oude Rengerink K; Lloyd E; Goetz I; Grobbee DE; Stolk P; Groenwold RH; Zuidgeest MG;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():95-100. PubMed ID: 27164273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 7. Safety, quality and monitoring.
Irving E; van den Bor R; Welsing P; Walsh V; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Harvey C; Garman N; Grobbee DE;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():6-12. PubMed ID: 28502812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are Novel, Nonrandomized Analytic Methods Fit for Decision Making? The Need for Prospective, Controlled, and Transparent Validation.
Eichler HG; Koenig F; Arlett P; Enzmann H; Humphreys A; Pétavy F; Schwarzer-Daum B; Sepodes B; Vamvakas S; Rasi G
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Apr; 107(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 31574163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction.
Zuidgeest MGP; Goetz I; Groenwold RHH; Irving E; van Thiel GJMW; Grobbee DE;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():7-13. PubMed ID: 28549929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.
Zeliadt SB; Coggeshall S; Thomas E; Gelman H; Taylor SL
Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):351-359. PubMed ID: 32522024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pragmatic Applications of RE-AIM for Health Care Initiatives in Community and Clinical Settings.
Glasgow RE; Estabrooks PE
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Jan; 15():E02. PubMed ID: 29300695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pragmatic clinical trials at the National Institute of Nursing Research.
Littleton-Kearney M
Nurs Outlook; 2018 Sep; 66(5):470-472. PubMed ID: 29699773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pragmatic trials revisited: applicability is about individualization.
Sacristán JA; Dilla T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():164-166. PubMed ID: 29432859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Can we assess the efficacy of psychotherapies in a clinical trial?].
Correard N; Consoloni JL; Belzeaux R; Fakra E; Adida M; Azorin JM
Encephale; 2016 Dec; 42(6S):S60-S64. PubMed ID: 28236995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 5. Usual care and real life comparators.
Zuidgeest MGP; Welsing PMJ; van Thiel GJMW; Ciaglia A; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Eckert L; Eijkemans MJC; Egger M;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():92-98. PubMed ID: 28694123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing the design of pragmatic trials: key issues remain.
Caro JJ; Ishak KJ
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jul; 1(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 24237466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatic design in randomized controlled trials.
Purgato M; Barbui C; Stroup S; Adams C
Psychol Med; 2015 Jan; 45(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 25065958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
