These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30131168)

  • 61. Five analytic challenges in working with electronic health records data to support clinical trials with some solutions.
    Goldstein BA
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32589046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Pragmatic surgical studies: are they the New Gold Standard.
    Simpson AHRW; Frost H; Norrie J
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1407-1408. PubMed ID: 30418050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Optimizing the Impact of Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Veteran and Military Populations: Lessons From the Pain Management Collaboratory.
    Ali J; Antonelli M; Bastian L; Becker W; Brandt CA; Burgess DJ; Burns A; Cohen SP; Davis AF; Dearth CL; Dziura J; Edwards R; Erdos J; Farrokhi S; Fritz J; Geda M; George SZ; Goertz C; Goodie J; Hastings SN; Heapy A; Ilfeld BM; Katsovich L; Kerns RD; Kyriakides TC; Lee A; Long CR; Luther SL; Martino S; Matheny ME; McGeary D; Midboe A; Pasquina P; Peduzzi P; Raffanello M; Rhon D; Rosen M; Esposito ER; Scarton D; Hastings SN; Seal K; Silliker N; Taylor S; Taylor SL; Tsui M; Wright FS; Zeliadt S
    Mil Med; 2022 Jul; 187(7-8):179-185. PubMed ID: 34791412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Design and analytic considerations for using patient-reported health data in pragmatic clinical trials: report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.
    Rockhold FW; Tenenbaum JD; Richesson R; Marsolo KA; O'Brien EC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Apr; 27(4):634-638. PubMed ID: 32027359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Leveraging electronic health record data for pragmatic randomized trials.
    Roe MT
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):368-369. PubMed ID: 32668979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A guide to research partnerships for pragmatic clinical trials.
    Johnson KE; Tachibana C; Coronado GD; Dember LM; Glasgow RE; Huang SS; Martin PJ; Richards J; Rosenthal G; Septimus E; Simon GE; Solberg L; Suls J; Thompson E; Larson EB
    BMJ; 2014 Dec; 349():g6826. PubMed ID: 25446054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Methodological function of hypotheses in science: old ideas in new cloth.
    Lastowski K; Makałowski W
    Genome Res; 2000 Mar; 10(3):273-4. PubMed ID: 10720568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Iterative approaches to the use of electronic health records data for large pragmatic studies.
    Jones WS; Wruck LM; Harrington RA; Hernandez AF
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Jun; 117():106789. PubMed ID: 35545204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Inconsistency prevents the valuable synergism of explanatory and pragmatic trails.
    Correia LCL; Correia VCA; Souza TMB; Cerqueira AMS; Alexandre FKB; Garcia G; Ferreira FRM; Lopes FOA
    J Evid Based Med; 2018 May; 11(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 29878580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Tools and Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation: Pragmatic Trials, Electronic Consent, and Data Linkages.
    Curtis JR; Foster PJ; Saag KG
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2019 May; 45(2):275-289. PubMed ID: 30952398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The use of community advisory boards in pragmatic clinical trials: The case of the adult day services plus project.
    Anderson KA; Dabelko-Schoeny H; Koeuth S; Marx K; Gitlin LN; Gaugler JE
    Home Health Care Serv Q; 2021; 40(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 32865476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Data monitoring committees for pragmatic clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS; Culbertson R; Gillen DL; Goodman S; Schrandt S; Zirkle M
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 26374679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Lessons Learned to Building Stakeholder Engagement during the Initial Stages of Pragmatic Research Development and Implementation.
    Combs J; Barzman D; Hemphill R; Osborn A; Sorter M; Decker R
    Psychiatr Q; 2021 Jun; 92(2):781-791. PubMed ID: 33057896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Afterword: Lessons Learned About Multicenter Research Collaboration.
    Moeller MP; Tomblin JB;
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):99S-101S. PubMed ID: 26731163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory study design on outcomes of systematic reviews of public health interventions: a case study on obesity prevention trials.
    Yoong SL; Wolfenden L; Clinton-McHarg T; Waters E; Pettman TL; Steele E; Wiggers J
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Mar; 36(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 24574064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. When Are Treatment Blinding and Treatment Standardization Necessary in Real-World Clinical Trials?
    Watanabe JH; Simon GE; Horberg M; Platt R; Hernandez A; Califf RM
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2022 Jan; 111(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 33829639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Meeting pragmatism halfway: making a pragmatic clinical trial protocol.
    Rushforth A
    Sociol Health Illn; 2015 Nov; 37(8):1285-98. PubMed ID: 26235211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Formulary restrictions may impact enrollment in pragmatic trials and limit generalizability of findings to vulnerable populations.
    Segal JB;
    Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):729-731. PubMed ID: 32650667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 4. Informed consent.
    Kalkman S; van Thiel GJMW; Zuidgeest MGP; Goetz I; Pfeiffer BM; Grobbee DE; van Delden JJM;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():181-187. PubMed ID: 28502809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.