204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3013123)
1. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy.
Larsen PN; Nielsen K; Schultz A; Mejdahl S; Larsen T; Moesgaard F
Acta Chir Scand; 1989 Sep; 155(9):461-4. PubMed ID: 2531963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dexon plus versus Maxon fascial closure in morbid obesity: a prospective randomized comparison.
Deitel M; Alhindawi R; Yamen M; To TB; Burul CJ
Can J Surg; 1990 Aug; 33(4):302-4. PubMed ID: 2166619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early laparotomy wound dehiscence: a randomized comparison of three suture materials and two methods of fascial closure.
Savolainen H; Ristkari S; Mokka R
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 2851958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania.
Chalya PL; Massinde AN; Kihunrwa A; Mabula JB
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():281. PubMed ID: 26121978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Lee S; Han SW; Lee MR; Kim CY; Ha GW
Trials; 2023 May; 24(1):311. PubMed ID: 37149610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized evaluation of midline fascial closure in gastric bariatric operations.
Brolin RE
Am J Surg; 1996 Oct; 172(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 8873523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal midline incision closure. A multicentric randomized prospective trial of 3,135 patients, comparing continuous vs interrupted polyglycolic acid sutures.
Fagniez PL; Hay JM; Lacàine F; Thomsen C
Arch Surg; 1985 Dec; 120(12):1351-3. PubMed ID: 2998297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
Bucknall TE; Ellis H
Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fascial closure of median laparotomies with a synthetic, resorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid)].
Ullrich F; Henningsen B; Böttcher W
Chirurg; 1981 Dec; 52(12):777-9. PubMed ID: 6274592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.
van 't Riet M; Steyerberg EW; Nellensteyn J; Bonjer HJ; Jeekel J
Br J Surg; 2002 Nov; 89(11):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12390373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).
Seiler CM; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Papyan A; Golcher H; Seidlmayer C; Franck A; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 19300233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.
Trimbos JB; Smit IB; Holm JP; Hermans J
Arch Surg; 1992 Oct; 127(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 1417492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.
Hodgson NC; Malthaner RA; Ostbye T
Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 10714638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The closure of abdominal wounds in cancer patients.
Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
J Surg Oncol; 1976; 8(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 136551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.
Hsiao WC; Young KC; Wang ST; Lin PW
World J Surg; 2000 Jun; 24(6):747-51; discussion 752. PubMed ID: 10773130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
