These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3013123)

  • 41. Is closure of the peritoneal layer necessary in the repair of midline surgical abdominal wounds?
    Hugh TB; Nankivell C; Meagher AP; Li B
    World J Surg; 1990; 14(2):231-3; discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 2139269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.
    Fortelny RH; Hofmann A; Gruber-Blum S; Petter-Puchner AH; Glaser KS
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 24149855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
    Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].
    Heger P; Pianka F; Diener MK; Mihaljevic AL
    Chirurg; 2016 Sep; 87(9):737-743. PubMed ID: 27392763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Meta-analysis of suture techniques for midline abdominal incisions].
    Jin JB; Jiang ZP; Chen S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 48(16):1256-61. PubMed ID: 21055218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design.
    López-Cano M; Pereira JA; Lozoya R; Feliu X; Villalobos R; Navarro S; Arbós MA; Armengol-Carrasco M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Nov; 39(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 25445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Continuous or interrupted fascial closure: a prospective evaluation of No. 1 Maxon suture in 402 gynecologic procedures.
    Orr JW; Orr PF; Barrett JM; Ellington JR; Jennings RH; Paredes KB; Patsner B; Taylor DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 163(5 Pt 1):1485-9. PubMed ID: 2240092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amount of suture material needed for continuous or interrupted wound closure: an experimental study.
    Trimbos JB; van Rooij J
    Eur J Surg; 1993 Mar; 159(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 8102887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of Prolene and Dexon.
    Cameron AE; Gray RC; Talbot RW; Wyatt AP
    Br J Surg; 1980 Jul; 67(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 6251939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Factors influencing wound complications: a clinical and experimental study.
    Bucknall TE
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Mar; 65(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 6299161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures.
    Corder AP; Schache DJ; Farquharson SM; Tristram S
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 1646881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mass closure of the abdominal wound with delayed absorbable suture in surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Hoffman MS; Villa A; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; LaPolla JP; Barton DP; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 2061883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An Evaluation of Fascial Closure Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Practice Patterns and Short-Term Outcomes.
    Fox SS; Huang LC; Hooks WB; Fischer JP; Hope WW
    Am Surg; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1213-1218. PubMed ID: 31775961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Wound complications after closure of abdominal incisions with Dexon or Vicryl. A randomized double-blind study.
    Gammelgaard N; Jensen J
    Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(5):505-8. PubMed ID: 6314720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRCTN24023541].
    Knaebel HP; Koch M; Sauerland S; Diener MK; Büchler MW; Seiler CM;
    BMC Surg; 2005 Mar; 5():3. PubMed ID: 15755324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Interrupted suture versus adhesive dressing in skin closure of pediatric inguinal hernia--a controlled randomized prospective study].
    Steinau G; Tittel A; Winkeltau G; Schumpelick V
    Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(11):599-602. PubMed ID: 1335199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Primary mass closure of fascial incisions using a continuous absorbable suture.
    Sorosky JI; Hewett WJ; Kaminski PF; Podczaski ES
    J Gynecol Surg; 1991; 7(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10150023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Continuous abdominal fascial closure: a randomized controlled trial of poly(L-lactide/glycolide).
    Orr JW; Montz FJ; Barter J; Schaitzberg SD; Delmore JE; Dodson MK; Gallup D; Yeh KA; Elias EG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 12893197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.
    Israelsson LA; Millbourn D
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1027-40. PubMed ID: 24035074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.