197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30131747)
1. Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.
Yamaguchi M; Clarke EL; Egan DL
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1407. PubMed ID: 30131747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.
Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():184-192. PubMed ID: 30340087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.
Saunders DR; Melcher D; van Zoest W
Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):852-862. PubMed ID: 28852867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 27826655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.
Wahn B; Kingstone A; König P
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():669. PubMed ID: 28515704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning of spatial configurations of a co-actor's attended objects in joint visual search.
Sakata C; Ueda Y; Moriguchi Y
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Apr; 215():103274. PubMed ID: 33631557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():113-120. PubMed ID: 28535468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Co-actors represent each other's task regularity through social statistical learning.
Zheng Z; Wang J
Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105411. PubMed ID: 36821997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.
Ray M; Welsh TN
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():542. PubMed ID: 29765341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance.
Sellaro R; Treccani B; Rubichi S; Cubelli R
Front Psychol; 2013; 4():844. PubMed ID: 24312066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural correlates of verbal joint action: ERPs reveal common perception and action systems in a shared-Stroop task.
Demiral ŞB; Gambi C; Nieuwland MS; Pickering MJ
Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 1649(Pt A):79-89. PubMed ID: 27553631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced encoding of the co-actor's target stimuli during a shared non-motor task.
Elekes F; Bródy G; Halász E; Király I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2376-2389. PubMed ID: 26624868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.
Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):371-85. PubMed ID: 21573746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When task sharing reduces interference: evidence for division-of-labour in Stroop-like tasks.
Sellaro R; Treccani B; Cubelli R
Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):327-342. PubMed ID: 29971545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.
van der Weiden A; Porcu E; Liepelt R
Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):537-552. PubMed ID: 35507019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construal level and free will beliefs shape perceptions of actors' proximal and distal intent.
Plaks JE; Robinson JS
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():777. PubMed ID: 26106352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuroimaging of the joint Simon effect with believed biological and non-biological co-actors.
Wen T; Hsieh S
Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():483. PubMed ID: 26388760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Reverse Stroop Task with Mouse Tracking.
Yamamoto N; Incera S; McLennan CT
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():670. PubMed ID: 27199881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
