These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30131817)

  • 1. The Value of Expanding the Training Population to Improve Genomic Selection Models in Tetraploid Potato.
    Sverrisdóttir E; Sundmark EHR; Johnsen HØ; Kirk HG; Asp T; Janss L; Bryan G; Nielsen KL
    Front Plant Sci; 2018; 9():1118. PubMed ID: 30131817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction of starch content and chipping quality in tetraploid potato using genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Sverrisdóttir E; Byrne S; Sundmark EHR; Johnsen HØ; Kirk HG; Asp T; Janss L; Nielsen KL
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Oct; 130(10):2091-2108. PubMed ID: 28707250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of marker types and density on genomic prediction and GWAS of key performance traits in tetraploid potato.
    Aalborg T; Sverrisdóttir E; Kristensen HT; Nielsen KL
    Front Plant Sci; 2024; 15():1340189. PubMed ID: 38525152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To be or not to be tetraploid-the impact of marker ploidy on genomic prediction and GWAS of potato.
    Aalborg T; Nielsen KL
    Front Plant Sci; 2024; 15():1386837. PubMed ID: 39139728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of genomic estimated breeding values for selection when using a finite population size in genetic improvement of tetraploid potato.
    Selga C; Reslow F; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Ortiz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34849763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome-Based Genotype × Environment Prediction Enhances Potato (
    Ortiz R; Crossa J; Reslow F; Perez-Rodriguez P; Cuevas J
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():785196. PubMed ID: 35197995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospects and Potential Uses of Genomic Prediction of Key Performance Traits in Tetraploid Potato.
    Stich B; Van Inghelandt D
    Front Plant Sci; 2018; 9():159. PubMed ID: 29563919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making the most of all data: Combining non-genotyped and genotyped potato individuals with HBLUP.
    Sood S; Lin Z; Caruana B; Slater AT; Daetwyler HD
    Plant Genome; 2020 Nov; 13(3):e20056. PubMed ID: 33217206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic Selection for Late Blight and Common Scab Resistance in Tetraploid Potato (
    Enciso-Rodriguez F; Douches D; Lopez-Cruz M; Coombs J; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2471-2481. PubMed ID: 29794167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection and genome-wide association studies in tetraploid chipping potatoes.
    Pandey J; Scheuring DC; Koym JW; Endelman JB; Vales MI
    Plant Genome; 2023 Mar; 16(1):e20297. PubMed ID: 36651146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient Genomic Prediction of Yield and Dry Matter in Hybrid Potato.
    Adams J; de Vries M; van Eeuwijk F
    Plants (Basel); 2023 Jul; 12(14):. PubMed ID: 37514232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction of agronomic traits in wheat using different models and cross-validation designs.
    Haile TA; Walkowiak S; N'Diaye A; Clarke JM; Hucl PJ; Cuthbert RD; Knox RE; Pozniak CJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Jan; 134(1):381-398. PubMed ID: 33135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population.
    Jarquín D; Kocak K; Posadas L; Hyma K; Jedlicka J; Graef G; Lorenz A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):740. PubMed ID: 25174348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide family prediction unveils molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of agronomic traits in
    Martins FB; Aono AH; Moraes ADCL; Ferreira RCU; Vilela MM; Pessoa-Filho M; Rodrigues-Motta M; Simeão RM; de Souza AP
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1303417. PubMed ID: 38148869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic Variance Partitioning and Genome-Wide Prediction with Allele Dosage Information in Autotetraploid Potato.
    Endelman JB; Carley CAS; Bethke PC; Coombs JJ; Clough ME; da Silva WL; De Jong WS; Douches DS; Frederick CM; Haynes KG; Holm DG; Miller JC; Muñoz PR; Navarro FM; Novy RG; Palta JP; Porter GA; Rak KT; Sathuvalli VR; Thompson AL; Yencho GC
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 29514860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotyping marker density and prediction models effects in long-term breeding schemes of cross-pollinated crops.
    DoVale JC; Carvalho HF; Sabadin F; Fritsche-Neto R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Dec; 135(12):4523-4539. PubMed ID: 36261658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.