893 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30132104)
1.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective comparison of
Zacho HD; Nielsen JB; Afshar-Oromieh A; Haberkorn U; deSouza N; De Paepe K; Dettmann K; Langkilde NC; Haarmark C; Fisker RV; Arp DT; Carl J; Jensen JB; Petersen LJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1884-1897. PubMed ID: 29876619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-Body Integrated [
Guberina N; Hetkamp P; Ruebben H; Fendler W; Grueneisen J; Suntharalingam S; Kirchner J; Puellen L; Harke N; Radtke JP; Umutlu L; Hadaschik BA; Herrmann K; Forsting M; Wetter A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):788-796. PubMed ID: 31482413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.
Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Francis RJ; Tang C; Vela I; Thomas P; Rutherford N; Martin JM; Frydenberg M; Shakher R; Wong LM; Taubman K; Ting Lee S; Hsiao E; Roach P; Nottage M; Kirkwood I; Hayne D; Link E; Marusic P; Matera A; Herschtal A; Iravani A; Hicks RJ; Williams S; Murphy DG;
Lancet; 2020 Apr; 395(10231):1208-1216. PubMed ID: 32209449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Prospective Comparison of
Harmon SA; Bergvall E; Mena E; Shih JH; Adler S; McKinney Y; Mehralivand S; Citrin DE; Couvillon A; Madan RA; Gulley JL; Mease RC; Jacobs PM; Pomper MG; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Lindenberg ML
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29602821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of [
Uprimny C; Svirydenka A; Fritz J; Kroiss AS; Nilica B; Decristoforo C; Haubner R; von Guggenberg E; Buxbaum S; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1873-1883. PubMed ID: 29766246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.
Domachevsky L; Bernstine H; Goldberg N; Nidam M; Catalano OA; Groshar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):328-336. PubMed ID: 31332559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic bone imaging in patients with prostate cancer: patient experience and acceptance of NaF-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and bone SPECT/CT.
Dyrberg E; Larsen EL; Hendel HW; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1119-1125. PubMed ID: 29313360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Study Comparing
Löfgren J; Mortensen J; Rasmussen SH; Madsen C; Loft A; Hansen AE; Oturai P; Jensen KE; Mørk ML; Reichkendler M; Højgaard L; Fischer BM
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1778-1785. PubMed ID: 28798033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and
Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Buddensieck C; Antke C; Ullrich T; Schimmöller L; Boos J; Schleich C; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Heusch P; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Müller HW; Hautzel H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30879122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiparametric whole-body 3.0-T MRI in newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for nodal and metastatic staging.
Johnston EW; Latifoltojar A; Sidhu HS; Ramachandran N; Sokolska M; Bainbridge A; Moore C; Ahmed HU; Punwani S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3159-3169. PubMed ID: 30519933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/MRI in the detection of skeletal metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: Contribution of each part to the diagnostic performance.
Asa S; Ozgur E; Uslu-Besli L; Ince B; Sager S; Demirdag C; Guner E; Sayman HB; Bakir B; Sonmezoglu K
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Jan; 44(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 36378618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Gou Z; Wu R; Yuan Y; Yu G; Zhao Y
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1915-1924. PubMed ID: 31127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted
Rowe SP; Li X; Trock BJ; Werner RA; Frey S; DiGianvittorio M; Bleiler JK; Reyes DK; Abdallah R; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31451492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer Agreement and Accuracy of
Zacho HD; Fonager RF; Nielsen JB; Haarmark C; Hendel HW; Johansen MB; Mortensen JC; Petersen LJ
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 31481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Hamed MAG; Basha MAA; Ahmed H; Obaya AA; Afifi AHM; Abdelbary EH
Acad Radiol; 2019 Apr; 26(4):450-460. PubMed ID: 29935970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
