315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30132125)
1. Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma.
Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S
HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):56-62. PubMed ID: 30132125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma (German version)].
Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S
HNO; 2018 Sep; 66(9):660-667. PubMed ID: 29971537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With Standard Length Electrodes in Adult Cochlear Implantation and the Uptake of Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Harrison L; Manjaly JG; Ellis W; Lavy JA; Shaida A; Khalil SS; Saeed SR
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):1060-1065. PubMed ID: 32569131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Carlson ML; Patel NS; Tombers NM; DeJong MD; Breneman AI; Neff BA; Driscoll CLW
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e128-e133. PubMed ID: 28538468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of Slim Modiolar electrode on residual hearing in pediatric patients.
Haber K; Neagu A; Konopka W; Amernik K; Gheorghe DC; Drela M; Wrukowska-Niemczewska I; Mierzwiński J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2723-2732. PubMed ID: 32897440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.
Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.
Gstoettner W; Kiefer J; Baumgartner WD; Pok S; Peters S; Adunka O
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 15224851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.
Brown RF; Hullar TE; Cadieux JH; Chole RA
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1221-6. PubMed ID: 20818293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients.
Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Melillo P; Cianfrone F; Scorpecci A; Paludetti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 264(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 17333229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children.
Spitzer ER; Kay-Rivest E; Waltzman SB; O'Brien-Russo CA; Santacatterina M; Roland JT; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 37167445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients.
Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing preservation with a slim modiolar cochlear implant in a pediatric cohort.
Jimenez JE; Govil N; Shaffer AD; Ledonne JC; Chi DH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 140():110479. PubMed ID: 33190921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation.
Hunter JB; Gifford RH; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Rivas A
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26825671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]