These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30132183)

  • 21. Coronary microvascular function and myocardial fibrosis in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER study.
    Mygind ND; Michelsen MM; Pena A; Qayyum AA; Frestad D; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Dose N; Faber R; Vejlstrup N; Hasbak P; Kjaer A; Prescott E; Kastrup J;
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Nov; 18(1):76. PubMed ID: 27809867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis and Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights From CMR T1 Mapping.
    Ntusi NAB; Piechnik SK; Francis JM; Ferreira VM; Matthews PM; Robson MD; Wordsworth PB; Neubauer S; Karamitsos TD
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):526-536. PubMed ID: 25890584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance evaluation of cardiac thrombi and masses by T1 and T2 mapping: an observational study.
    Caspar T; El Ghannudi S; Ohana M; Labani A; Lawson A; Ohlmann P; Morel O; De Mathelin M; Roy C; Gangi A; Germain P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 33(4):551-559. PubMed ID: 27904982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifying the Infarct-Related Artery in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Heitner JF; Senthilkumar A; Harrison JK; Klem I; Sketch MH; Ivanov A; Hamo C; Van Assche L; White J; Washam J; Patel MR; Bekkers SCAM; Smulders MW; Sacchi TJ; Kim RJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(5):e007305. PubMed ID: 31035776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The diagnostic value of quantitative imaging for acute myocardial infarction].
    Cui Q; Yu J; Ge X; Gao G; Liu Y; He Q; Cui Q; Wang H; Shen A
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Feb; 34(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 35387725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography.
    Wright J; Adriaenssens T; Dymarkowski S; Desmet W; Bogaert J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 19608131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of inflamed myocardium using iron oxide nanoparticles in patients with acute myocardial infarction - preliminary results.
    Yilmaz A; Rösch S; Klingel K; Kandolf R; Helluy X; Hiller KH; Jakob PM; Sechtem U
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 163(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 21689857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation-myocardial infarction.
    Eitel I; Kubusch K; Strohm O; Desch S; Mikami Y; de Waha S; Gutberlet M; Schuler G; Friedrich MG; Thiele H
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jul; 4(4):354-62. PubMed ID: 21518773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term prognosis of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to coronary arteries atherosclerosis extent on coronary angiography: a historical cohort study.
    Alzuhairi KS; Søgaard P; Ravkilde J; Azimi A; Mæng M; Jensen LO; Torp-Pedersen C
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Nov; 17(1):279. PubMed ID: 29145828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury.
    Verhaert D; Thavendiranathan P; Giri S; Mihai G; Rajagopalan S; Simonetti OP; Raman SV
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Mar; 4(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 21414575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Myocardium at risk in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction comparison of T2-weighted edema imaging with the MR-assessed endocardial surface area and validation against angiographic scoring.
    Fuernau G; Eitel I; Franke V; Hildebrandt L; Meissner J; de Waha S; Lurz P; Gutberlet M; Desch S; Schuler G; Thiele H
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(9):967-76. PubMed ID: 21920334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraindividual comparison of T1 relaxation times after gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA administration for cardiac late enhancement imaging.
    Doeblin P; Schilling R; Wagner M; Luhur R; Huppertz A; Hamm B; Taupitz M; Durmus T
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 24433640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinction of salvaged and infarcted myocardium within the ischaemic area-at-risk with T2 mapping.
    Hammer-Hansen S; Ugander M; Hsu LY; Taylor J; Thune JJ; Køber L; Kellman P; Arai AE
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 15(9):1048-53. PubMed ID: 24810903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative T2 mapping after reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A comparison with late gadolinium enhancement and cine MR imaging.
    Park CH; Choi EY; Yoon YW; Kwon HM; Hong BK; Lee BK; Min PK; Greiser A; Paek MY; Hwang SH; Kim TH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1246-1252. PubMed ID: 26278969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance of native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping to detect myocardial damage in patients with suspected myocarditis: a head-to-head comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques.
    Nadjiri J; Nieberler H; Hendrich E; Greiser A; Will A; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 33(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 27878700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of Gender on Patients With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
    Johnston N; Jönelid B; Christersson C; Kero T; Renlund H; Schenck-Gustafsson K; Lagerqvist B
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 115(12):1661-6. PubMed ID: 25900352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of scar and ischemia burden early after acute ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
    Plein S; Younger JF; Sparrow P; Ridgway JP; Ball SG; Greenwood JP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2008 Oct; 10(1):47. PubMed ID: 18950527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of Characteristics of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Dong S; Liu Y; Sun W; Wang C; Wang Y; Zhao W; Zhao S; Chu Y
    Med Sci Monit; 2021 Oct; 27():e933220. PubMed ID: 34667142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Initial Imaging-Guided Strategy Versus Routine Care in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Smulders MW; Kietselaer BLJH; Wildberger JE; Dagnelie PC; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Mingels AMA; van Cauteren YJM; Theunissen RALJ; Post MJ; Schalla S; van Kuijk SMJ; Das M; Kim RJ; Crijns HJGM; Bekkers SCAM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 74(20):2466-2477. PubMed ID: 31727284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.