189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30133673)
1. Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties, antibacterial effect, and cytotoxicity of temporary restorative materials.
Peralta SL; Leles SB; Dutra AL; Guimarães VBDS; Piva E; Lund RG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20170562. PubMed ID: 30133673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and characterization of a novel bulk-fill elastomeric temporary restorative composite.
Peralta SL; Dutra AL; Leles SB; Ribeiro JS; Ogliari FA; Piva E; Lund RG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 27():e20180183. PubMed ID: 30540074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibacterial properties of temporary filling materials.
Slutzky H; Slutzky-Goldberg I; Weiss EI; Matalon S
J Endod; 2006 Mar; 32(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 16500229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sealing ability, water sorption, solubility and toothbrushing abrasion resistance of temporary filling materials.
Pieper CM; Zanchi CH; Rodrigues-Junior SA; Moraes RR; Pontes LS; Bueno M
Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):893-9. PubMed ID: 19549149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antibacterial potential of contemporary dental luting cements.
Daugela P; Oziunas R; Zekonis G
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18493161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of an antibacterial root canal filling system containing MDPB.
Kitagawa R; Kitagawa H; Izutani N; Hirose N; Hayashi M; Imazato S
J Dent Res; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 25192898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antibacterial effect of selected root-end filling materials.
Eldeniz AU; Hadimli HH; Ataoglu H; Orstavik D
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 16554209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model resin composites incorporating ZnO-NP: activity against S. mutans and physicochemical properties characterization.
Brandão NL; Portela MB; Maia LC; Antônio A; Silva VLME; Silva EMD
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20170270. PubMed ID: 29742262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparation of Bis-GMA free dental resin composites with anti-adhesion effect against Streptococcus mutans using synthesized fluorine-containing methacrylate (DFMA).
Zhang S; Liao M; Liu F; Huang X; Mai S; He J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jul; 131():105263. PubMed ID: 35526345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of different types of temporary restorative materials used in endodontics.
Uçtaşli MB; Tinaz AC
J Oral Sci; 2000 Jun; 42(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 10989586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporation of chlorhexidine diacetate in provisional cements: antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans and the effect on tensile strength in vitro.
Lewinstein I; Zenziper E; Block J; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 Nov; 45(11):1010-7. PubMed ID: 22563792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro.
Boeckh C; Schumacher E; Podbielski A; Haller B
Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12037366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of addition of [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride to an experimental adhesive.
Collares FM; Leitune VCB; Franken P; Parollo CF; Ogliari FA; Samuel SMW
Braz Oral Res; 2017 May; 31():e31. PubMed ID: 28513783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.
Duque C; Aida KL; Pereira JA; Teixeira GS; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Perrone LR; Caiaffa KS; Negrini TC; Castilho ARF; Costa CAS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 29069152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antibacterial activity of potential retrograde root filling materials.
Chong BS; Owadally ID; Pitt Ford TR; Wilson RF
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Apr; 10(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 8062809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment.
Davidovich E; Weiss E; Fuks AB; Beyth N
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Oct; 138(10):1347-52. PubMed ID: 17908849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antibacterial and physical properties of calcium-phosphate and calcium-fluoride nanocomposites with chlorhexidine.
Cheng L; Weir MD; Xu HH; Kraigsley AM; Lin NJ; Lin-Gibson S; Zhou X
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 22317794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An In vitro Study.
Feroz S; Bhoyar A; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):973-977. PubMed ID: 27965482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antibacterial, cytotoxic and mechanical properties of a orthodontic cement with phosphate nano-sized and phosphorylated chitosan: An in vitro study.
Fernandes GLP; Vanim MM; Delbem ACB; Martorano AS; Raucci LMSC; de Oliveira PT; Zucolotto V; Dias BJM; Brighenti FL; de Oliveira AB; Moraes JCS; de Camargo ER; Danelon M
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105073. PubMed ID: 38782176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
