These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30135337)

  • 1. Comparison between direct chairside and digitally fabricated temporary crowns.
    Abdullah AO; Pollington S; Liu Y
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Nov; 37(6):957-963. PubMed ID: 30135337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns.
    Abdullah AO; Tsitrou EA; Pollington S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 27383707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling.
    Yao J; Li J; Wang Y; Huang H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 24721504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
    Ender A; Bienz S; Mörmann W; Mehl A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.
    Jalalian E; Younesi F; Golalipour S; Khorshidi S; Mahdavisaedabadi SH; Sayyari M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Nov; 24(11):853-858. PubMed ID: 38238272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported temporary crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Raab P; Hahnel S; Stöckle M; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 28110407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Hahnel S; Engelhardt F; Behr M; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 27370027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns.
    Tsitrou EA; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19683378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Cho L; Choi J; Yi YJ; Park CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 15211298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations.
    Furtado de Mendonca A; Shahmoradi M; Gouvêa CVD; De Souza GM; Ellakwa A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e587-e594. PubMed ID: 30121945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.
    Shembish FA; Tong H; Kaizer M; Janal MN; Thompson VP; Opdam NJ; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 26777092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal-internal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM crown restorations.
    Yildiz C; Vanlioğlu BA; Evren B; Uludamar A; Ozkan YK
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 23370869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
    Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.