These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30135829)

  • 1. Experiences of Playscan: Interviews with users of a responsible gambling tool.
    Forsström D; Jansson-Fröjmark M; Hesser H; Carlbring P
    Internet Interv; 2017 Jun; 8():53-62. PubMed ID: 30135829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gamblers' Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Forsström D; Rozental A; Wiklund E; Carlbring P; Lindner P
    J Gambl Stud; 2022 Jun; 38(2):591-606. PubMed ID: 34091781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social responsibility tools in online gambling: a survey of attitudes and behavior among Internet gamblers.
    Griffiths MD; Wood RT; Parke J
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2009 Aug; 12(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 19594379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usage of a Responsible Gambling Tool: A Descriptive Analysis and Latent Class Analysis of User Behavior.
    Forsström D; Hesser H; Carlbring P
    J Gambl Stud; 2016 Sep; 32(3):889-904. PubMed ID: 26753878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform.
    Ivanova E; Rafi J; Lindner P; Carlbring P
    Addict Behav Rep; 2019 Jun; 9():100161. PubMed ID: 31193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling Early Gambling Behavior Using Indicators from Online Lottery Gambling Tracking Data: Longitudinal Analysis.
    Challet-Bouju G; Hardouin JB; Thiabaud E; Saillard A; Donnio Y; Grall-Bronnec M; Perrot B
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e17675. PubMed ID: 32254041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gambling Responsibly: Who Does It and To What End?
    Hing N; Sproston K; Tran K; Russell AM
    J Gambl Stud; 2017 Mar; 33(1):149-165. PubMed ID: 27150462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding gambling in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study on the experiences of gamblers' families.
    Azemi F; Avdyli M; Bytyqi V
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1009923. PubMed ID: 36949903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study.
    Auer MM; Griffiths MD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1406. PubMed ID: 26441779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsible gambling in practice: A case study of views and practices of Swedish oriented gambling companies.
    Forsström D; Cisneros Örnberg J
    Nordisk Alkohol Nark; 2019 Apr; 36(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 32934553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responsible gambling among older adults: a qualitative exploration.
    Subramaniam M; Satghare P; Vaingankar JA; Picco L; Browning CJ; Chong SA; Thomas SA
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Apr; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28376751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct Marketing Experiences Among Individuals With Current and Lifetime Gambling Disorder.
    Syvertsen A; Pallesen S; Erevik EK; Mentzoni RA
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1957. PubMed ID: 32849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using cross-game behavioral markers for early identification of high-risk internet gamblers.
    Braverman J; LaPlante DA; Nelson SE; Shaffer HJ
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Sep; 27(3):868-77. PubMed ID: 24059836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Online Versus Offline Gambling Harm in Portuguese Pathological Gamblers: An Empirical Study.
    Hubert P; Griffiths MD
    Int J Ment Health Addict; 2018; 16(5):1219-1237. PubMed ID: 30416402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further Exploration of the Psychometric Properties of GamTest: A Rasch Analysis.
    Forsström D; Rozental A; Kottorp A; Lindner P; Jansson-Fröjmark M; Hesser H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33946511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of responsible gambling framing on people with lived experience of gambling harm.
    Marko S; Thomas SL; Pitt H; Daube M
    Front Sociol; 2023; 8():1074773. PubMed ID: 36960306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing Consumer Protection for Gamblers Across Different Online Gambling Operators: A Replication Study.
    Catania M; Griffiths MD
    Int J Ment Health Addict; 2021 Nov; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 34776807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation and Application of the Positive Play Scale Adapted for Chinese Gamblers: Its Relation to Disordered Gambling and Gambling Attitudes.
    Tong KK; Chen JH; Wu AMS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():263. PubMed ID: 32158413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Greater involvement and diversity of Internet gambling as a risk factor for problem gambling.
    Gainsbury SM; Russell A; Blaszczynski A; Hing N
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 25745873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the business versus care paradox in gambling venues: a qualitative study of the perspectives from gamblers, venue staff and counsellors.
    Riley BJ; Orlowski S; Smith D; Baigent M; Battersby M; Lawn S
    Harm Reduct J; 2018 Sep; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 30249255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.