These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30136018)

  • 1. Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin.
    Ortiz A; Galvis V; Tello A; Viaña V; Corrales MI; Ochoa M; Rodriguez CJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1809-1818. PubMed ID: 30136018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictability of Biometry in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.
    Sorkin N; Rosenblatt A; Barequet IS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Dec; 93(12):1545-1551. PubMed ID: 27741085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
    Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
    Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer.
    Mandal P; Berrow EJ; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS; Uthoff D; Holland D; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 98(2):256-8. PubMed ID: 24227803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].
    El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar.
    McAlinden C; Gao R; Yu A; Wang X; Yang J; Yu Y; Chen H; Wang Q; Huang J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 101(9):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 28130351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.
    Cruysberg LP; Doors M; Verbakel F; Berendschot TT; De Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 19692383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].
    Hildebrandt AL; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Aug; 108(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 21607812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.
    Dong J; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Jia Z; Zhang S; Wang X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194273. PubMed ID: 29543854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers.
    Sabatino F; Matarazzo F; Findl O; Maurino V
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1124-1129. PubMed ID: 31174987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and agreement of 3 optical biometers in measuring axial length in the eyes of patients with mature cataracts.
    Henriquez MA; Zúñiga R; Camino M; Camargo J; Ruiz-Montenegro K; Izquierdo L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 32379086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates With Biometers Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Compared to Partial-Coherence Interferometry and Optical Low-Coherence Interferometry.
    McAlinden C; Wang Q; Gao R; Zhao W; Yu A; Li Y; Guo Y; Huang J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 173():64-69. PubMed ID: 27664702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
    Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry.
    Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.