BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30136420)

  • 1. Network meta-analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization.
    Verardi R; Fioravanti F; Barbero U; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Rinaldi M; Escaned J; D'Ascenzo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 30136420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease.
    Warisawa T; Cook CM; Ahmad Y; Howard JP; Seligman H; Rajkumar C; Toya T; Doi S; Nakajima A; Nakayama M; Vera-Urquiza R; Yuasa S; Sato T; Kikuta Y; Kawase Y; Nishina H; Al-Lamee R; Sen S; Lerman A; Matsuo H; Akashi YJ; Escaned J; Davies JE
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 Jul; 39(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 38642290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR.
    Eftekhari A; Holck EN; Westra J; Olsen NT; Bruun NH; Jensen LO; Engstrøm T; Christiansen EH
    Eur Heart J; 2023 Nov; 44(41):4376-4384. PubMed ID: 37634144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Coronary Stenoses for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    d'Entremont MA; Tiong D; Sadeghirad B; McGrath BP; Cioffi GM; Garni TA; Cheema ZM; Layland J; Revaiah PC; Serruys PW; Stone GW; Jolly SS
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 223():29-39. PubMed ID: 38768846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised multicentre study of angiography- versus physiologyguided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing TAVI: design and rationale of the FAITAVI trial.
    Ribichini F; Pesarini G; Fabris T; Lunardi M; Barbierato M; D'Amico G; Zanchettin C; Gregori D; Piva T; Nicolini E; Gandolfo C; Fineschi M; Petronio AS; Berti S; Caprioglio F; Saia F; Sclafani R; Esposito G; D'Ascenzo F; Tarantini G
    EuroIntervention; 2024 Apr; 20(8):e504-e510. PubMed ID: 38629420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of cardiac history and myocardial scar on increase of myocardial perfusion after revascularization.
    Jukema RA; de Winter RW; Hopman LHGA; Driessen RS; van Diemen PA; Appelman Y; Twisk JWR; Planken RN; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P; Danad I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Nov; 50(13):3897-3909. PubMed ID: 37561140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention vs. medical therapy for patients with stable coronary lesions: meta-analysis of individual patient data.
    Zimmermann FM; Omerovic E; Fournier S; Kelbæk H; Johnson NP; Rothenbühler M; Xaplanteris P; Abdel-Wahab M; Barbato E; Høfsten DE; Tonino PAL; Boxma-de Klerk BM; Fearon WF; Køber L; Smits PC; De Bruyne B; Pijls NHJ; Jüni P; Engstrøm T
    Eur Heart J; 2019 Jan; 40(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 30596995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison among various physiology and angiography-guided strategies for deferring percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.
    Kiyohara Y; Kishino Y; Ueyama HA; Takahashi T; Kobayashi Y; Takagi H; Wiley J; Kuno T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Apr; 61():35-41. PubMed ID: 37891055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Physiology Pullback for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance: Is this the Future?
    Nijjer SS
    Cardiol Clin; 2024 Feb; 42(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 37949539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy.
    Matsumura M; Maehara A; Davis JE; Kumar G; Sharp A; Samady H; Seto AH; Cohen D; Patel MR; Ali ZA; Stone GW; Jeremias A
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Dec; 19(11):e903-e912. PubMed ID: 38031488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intracoronary physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes.
    Scarsini R; Tebaldi M; Rubino F; Sgreva S; Vescovo G; Barbierato M; Vicerè A; Galante D; Mammone C; Lunardi M; Tavella D; Pesarini G; Campo G; Leone AM; Ribichini FL
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 112(9):1331-1342. PubMed ID: 37338598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential predictability for high-risk plaque characteristics between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.
    Lee JM; Shin D; Lee SH; Choi KH; Kim SM; Chun EJ; Lee KY; Hwang D; Ahn SG; Brown AJ; Mejía-Rentería H; Lefieux A; Molony D; Chang K; Kakuta T; Escaned J; Samady H
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16005. PubMed ID: 37749337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractional flow reserve use in coronary artery revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sanz Sánchez J; Farjat Pasos JI; Martinez Solé J; Hussain B; Kumar S; Garg M; Chiarito M; Teira Calderón A; Sorolla-Romero JA; Echavarria Pinto M; Shin ES; Diez Gil JL; Waksman R; van de Hoef TP; Garcia-Garcia HM
    iScience; 2023 Aug; 26(8):107245. PubMed ID: 37520737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical effects of physiologic lesion testing in influencing treatment strategy for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
    Rawal H; Nguyen TD; Igbinomwanhia E; Klein LW
    Am Heart J Plus; 2024 Apr; 40():100378. PubMed ID: 38510505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies on fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization.
    Mangiacapra F; Paolucci L; Johnson NP; Viscusi MM; Ussia GP; Grigioni F; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38432325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic differences between physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal medical therapy in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Islam U; Sabbah M; Özbek BT; Madsen JM; Lønborg JT; Engstrøm T
    Am Heart J Plus; 2024 Feb; 38():100362. PubMed ID: 38510744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of coronary physiology - the evidence and implications.
    Ali N; Patel PA; Malkin CJ
    Clin Med (Lond); 2019 Sep; 19(5):364-368. PubMed ID: 31530682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contemporary Use of Coronary Physiology in Cardiology.
    Elbadawi A; Sedhom R; Ghoweba M; Etewa AM; Kayani W; Rahman F
    Cardiol Ther; 2023 Dec; 12(4):589-614. PubMed ID: 37668939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, or Angiography-Guided Revascularization in Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study.
    Pintea Bentea G; Berdaoui B; Samyn S; Morissens M; van de Borne P; Castro Rodriguez J
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 211():69-71. PubMed ID: 38180036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.