These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30136781)

  • 21. Patenting and licensing in genetic testing: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
    Aymé S; Matthijs G; Soini S;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 May; 16 Suppl 1():S10-9. PubMed ID: 18432281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The human genome, property of all: opportunities under the ALRC inquiry into gene patenting and human health.
    Hinojosa JP
    Syd Law Rev; 2004 Sep; 26(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 16523584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The disquieting consequences of granting patents on human genes for healthcare and scientific research in The Netherlands].
    Leschot NJ; Mannens MM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Aug; 148(35):1712-5. PubMed ID: 15468898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law?
    Caulfield TA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 12628363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Genetic comment on patenting of biotechnology inventions in the adaptation of the Spanish Patenting Law to the European framework].
    Lacadena JR
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (16):199-221. PubMed ID: 12379987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Greenberg v. Miami Children 's Hospital: unjust enrichment and the patenting of human genetic material.
    Greenfield DL
    Ann Health Law; 2006; 15(2):213-49, table of contents. PubMed ID: 17554842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patenting of human genetic material v. bioethics: revisiting the case of John Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    Narayanan N
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2010; 7(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 20432879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What's the use? Law and authority in patenting human genetic material.
    Kahn J
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2003; 14(2):417-44. PubMed ID: 15212025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Take off your genes and let the doctor have a look: why the Mayo and Myriad decisions have invalidated method claims for genetic diagnostic testing.
    Bergin C
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2013; 63(1):173-217. PubMed ID: 25335200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mayo, Myriad, America Invents Act and BPCIA: how has the United States biopharmaceutical market been affected?
    Finston SK; Davey NS; Davé E; Ravichandran V; Davey SR; Davé RS
    Pharm Pat Anal; 2016 May; 5(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 27087460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patents, genomics, research, and diagnostics.
    Barton JH
    Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1339-47. PubMed ID: 12480644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.
    Du L; Kamenova K; Caulfield T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26302779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patents, genomics, and academic medicine.
    Korn D; Heinig SJ
    Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1301-8. PubMed ID: 12480640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The European opposition against the BRCA gene patents.
    Matthijs G
    Fam Cancer; 2006; 5(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 16528613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An overview of patent law as applied to the field of veterinary medicine.
    Gould JM
    AAPS J; 2008; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18446500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ACOG. Committee opinion: number 277, November 2002. Patients, medicine and the interests of patients: applying general principles to gene patenting.
    Comittee on Ethics, Comittee on Genetics, The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12434779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LabCorp v. Metabolite Laboratories: The Supreme Court listens, but declines to speak.
    Klein RD; Mahoney MJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(1):141-9, 4. PubMed ID: 18315767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Human genes patents: yes or no? Reflections on the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States].
    Lacadena JR
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2013; (38):167-81. PubMed ID: 24340831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should there be property rights in genes?
    Dworkin G
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1997 Aug; 352(1357):1077-86. PubMed ID: 9304674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The patentability of human beings: the effect of a proposed exclusion in the Patents Act 1953.
    MacBean A
    Law Rev; 2002 Nov; 33(2):379-407. PubMed ID: 15212079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.