These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30137222)

  • 1. Sons May Be Bad for Maternal Health at Older Age: New Evidence for Costs of Reproduction in Humans.
    Galbarczyk A; Klimek M; Nenko I; Jasienska G
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 74(5):648-651. PubMed ID: 30137222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life history trade-offs associated with exposure to low maternal capital are different in sons compared to daughters: Evidence from a prospective Brazilian birth cohort.
    Wells JCK; Cole TJ; Cortina-Borja M; Sear R; Leon DA; Marphatia AA; Murray J; Wehrmeister FC; Oliveira PD; Gonçalves H; Oliveira IO; Menezes AMB
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():914965. PubMed ID: 36203666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inflammaging: Blame the sons. Relationships between the number of sons and the level of inflammatory mediators among post-reproductive women.
    Galbarczyk A; Klimek M; Blukacz M; Nenko I; Jabłońska M; Jasienska G
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 Jul; 175(3):656-664. PubMed ID: 33929754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Daughters increase longevity of fathers, but daughters and sons equally reduce longevity of mothers.
    Jasienska G; Nenko I; Jasienski M
    Am J Hum Biol; 2006; 18(3):422-5. PubMed ID: 16634019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Birth interval and the sex of children in a traditional African population: an evolutionary analysis.
    Mace R; Sear R
    J Biosoc Sci; 1997 Oct; 29(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 9881149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age difference between parents influences parity and number of sons.
    Kuna B; Galbarczyk A; Klimek M; Nenko I; Jasienska G
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 May; 30(3):e23095. PubMed ID: 29350436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A trade-off between having many sons and shorter maternal post-reproductive survival in pre-industrial Finland.
    Helle S; Lummaa V
    Biol Lett; 2013 Apr; 9(2):20130034. PubMed ID: 23445948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of son preference on the contraceptive use and fertility of Sri Lankan women.
    De Silva WI
    J Biosoc Sci; 1993 Jul; 25(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 8360227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal longevity and the sex of offspring in pre-industrial Sweden.
    Cesarini D; Lindqvist E; Wallace B
    Ann Hum Biol; 2007; 34(5):535-46. PubMed ID: 17786589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia.
    Pong SL
    Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(3):137-48. PubMed ID: 7940619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The desire for sons and excess fertility: a household-level analysis of parity progression in India.
    Chaudhuri S
    Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2012 Dec; 38(4):178-86. PubMed ID: 23318167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low Maternal Capital Predicts Life History Trade-Offs in Daughters: Why Adverse Outcomes Cluster in Individuals.
    Wells JCK; Cole TJ; Cortina-Borja M; Sear R; Leon DA; Marphatia AA; Murray J; Wehrmeister FC; Oliveira PD; Gonçalves H; Oliveira IO; Menezes AMB
    Front Public Health; 2019; 7():206. PubMed ID: 31417889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Let her die.
    Cowan B
    Indian J Matern Child Health; 1990; 1(4):127-8. PubMed ID: 12346026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Son preference, fertility desire and contraceptive use in two largest cities of Pakistan.
    Farooqui MN
    Pak Popul Rev; 1990; 1(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12317086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex composition of living children in a matrilineal inheritance system and its association with pregnancy intendedness and postpartum family planning intentions in rural Ghana.
    Eliason S; Baiden F; Tuoyire DA; Awusabo-Asare K
    Reprod Health; 2018 Nov; 15(1):187. PubMed ID: 30413219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Desired family size and son preference among Hispanic women of low socioeconomic status.
    Unger JB; Molina GB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(6):284-7. PubMed ID: 9429876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The delineation of fertility strategies in a tribal population of India: the Koyas of Koraput District, Orissa.
    Roth EA; Ray AK; Mohanty B
    J Anthropol Res; 1983; 39(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 12279739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Son and daughter preferences in Benighat, Nepal: implications for fertility transition.
    Niraula BB; Morgan SP
    Soc Biol; 1995; 42(3-4):256-73. PubMed ID: 8738551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of reproductive status changes on family functioning and well-being of mothers and daughters.
    Paikoff RL; Brooks-gunn J; Carlton-ford S
    J Early Adolesc; 1991 May; 11(2):201-20. PubMed ID: 12285821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do sons reduce parental mortality?
    Pham-Kanter G; Goldman N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Aug; 66(8):710-5. PubMed ID: 21551178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.