BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30137294)

  • 1. The state of the art in peer review.
    Tennant JP
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2018 Oct; 365(19):. PubMed ID: 30137294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?
    Baffy G; Burns MM; Hoffmann B; Ramani S; Sabharwal S; Borus JF; Pories S; Quan SF; Ingelfinger JR
    Am J Med; 2020 Jan; 133(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 31419421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.
    Tennant JP; Dugan JM; Graziotin D; Jacques DC; Waldner F; Mietchen D; Elkhatib Y; B Collister L; Pikas CK; Crick T; Masuzzo P; Caravaggi A; Berg DR; Niemeyer KE; Ross-Hellauer T; Mannheimer S; Rigling L; Katz DS; Greshake Tzovaras B; Pacheco-Mendoza J; Fatima N; Poblet M; Isaakidis M; Irawan DE; Renaut S; Madan CR; Matthias L; Nørgaard Kjær J; O'Donnell DP; Neylon C; Kearns S; Selvaraju M; Colomb J
    F1000Res; 2017; 6():1151. PubMed ID: 29188015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services.
    Grossmann A; Brembs B
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():20. PubMed ID: 34316354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Gerasimov AN; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 25829801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing.
    Kulczycki E; Rozkosz EA; Engels TCE; Guns R; Hołowiecki M; Pölönen J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214423. PubMed ID: 30908515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Headache at a Janus moment: Reflecting back on the past 20 years of scholarly publishing and looking ahead to inevitable change.
    Roberts J
    Headache; 2023 Jan; 63(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 36633141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of social media in cardiology.
    Mandrola J; Futyma P
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Jan; 30(1):32-35. PubMed ID: 30773326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
    Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
    J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers.
    Willis JV; Cobey KD; Ramos J; Chow R; Ng JY; Alayche M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 161():65-73. PubMed ID: 37421994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.
    Tennant JP; Waldner F; Jacques DC; Masuzzo P; Collister LB; Hartgerink CH
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():632. PubMed ID: 27158456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innovations in scholarly publishing. Evolving trends in research communication in a digital age: examples from the BMJ.
    Jain A
    Keio J Med; 2014; 63(4):67-8. PubMed ID: 25588512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Vision for Preparing the Next Generation of Reviewers for the Scholarly Scientific Publication Process.
    Habal MB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):275-6. PubMed ID: 26963295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor ID.
    Gasparyan AY; Akazhanov NA; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1453-6. PubMed ID: 25408574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science that Inspires.
    Cell Press Team
    Cell; 2020 Jan; 180(2):209-210. PubMed ID: 31978336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer Reviewers and Their Critical Contributions to Scholarly Publishing.
    Avery MD
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 May; 67(3):293-294. PubMed ID: 35593318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview.
    Ford E
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():6. PubMed ID: 25767695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Downside of the Shifting Paradigm of Scholarly Publishing in the Biomedical Sciences: Predatory Publishing.
    Franco EL
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Jul; 39(7):513-515. PubMed ID: 28377292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.