These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30137294)

  • 21. Love writing.
    Marder E
    Elife; 2019 Mar; 8():. PubMed ID: 30843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A; Dobránszki J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Aug; 23(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 27909954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.
    Dougherty MR; Slevc LR; Grand JA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):361-375. PubMed ID: 30629888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Filtering the field.
    Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Nov; 16(11):643. PubMed ID: 31654050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Publishing (whatever that means) neuroscience in the new millennium.
    Bloom FE
    Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 886(1-2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11119682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?
    Sen CK
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2012 Feb; 16(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 22098370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities.
    Maryl M; Błaszczyńska M; Szulińska A; Rams P
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():1265. PubMed ID: 33520195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
    Tarkang EE; Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review Practices in Kriterium, A Portal for Quality-Marked Monographs and Edited Volumes in Swedish SSH.
    Hammarfelt B; Hammar I; Francke H
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():740297. PubMed ID: 34778695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scholarly communication: cultural contexts, evolving models.
    Harley D
    Science; 2013 Oct; 342(6154):80-2. PubMed ID: 24092736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
    Beall J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gerasimov AN; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1545-52. PubMed ID: 26538996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship.
    Dumenco L; Engle DL; Goodell K; Nagler A; Ovitsh RK; Whicker SA
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 27680319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scholarly publication practices of Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurses.
    Broome ME; Riner ME; Allam ES
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Aug; 52(8):429-34. PubMed ID: 23855342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review-A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists.
    Baždarić K; Vrkić I; Arh E; Mavrinac M; Gligora Marković M; Bilić-Zulle L; Stojanovski J; Malički M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0244529. PubMed ID: 34153041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement.
    Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.
    Dergaa I; Zakhama L; Dziri C; Ben Saad H
    Tunis Med; 2023 Oct; 101(10):721-726. PubMed ID: 38465750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Publishing peer review materials.
    Beck J; Funk K; Harrison M; McEntyre J; Breen J; Collings A; Donohoe P; Evans M; Flintoft L; Hamelers A; Hurst P; Lemberger T; Lin J; O'Connor N; Parkin M; Parker S; Rodgers P; Skipper M; Stoner M
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1655. PubMed ID: 30416719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Healthcare improvement is incomplete until it is published: the cystic fibrosis initiative to support scholarly publication.
    Stevens DP; Marshall BC
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Apr; 23 Suppl 1():i104-7. PubMed ID: 24608545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust Psychological Science Through Registered Reports and Results-Blind Reviewing.
    Grand JA; Rogelberg SG; Banks GC; Landis RS; Tonidandel S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 29961411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.