These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30137603)

  • 61. The overview of internal exposure monitoring in Lithuania.
    Griciene B; Ladygiene R; Morkunas G; Pilkyte L; Urboniene A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):398-401. PubMed ID: 17827133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. General principles of monitoring for radiation protection of workers. A report of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Production.
    Ann ICRP; 1982; 9(4):1-36. PubMed ID: 7165184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Realizing the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB) - concluding remarks.
    Lloyd D; Turai I; Voisin P
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Jan; 93(1):142-144. PubMed ID: 27160022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Tools for placing the radiological health hazard in perspective following a severe emergency at a light water reactor (LWR) or its spent fuel pool.
    McKenna T; Welter PV; Callen J; Martincic R; Dodd B; Kutkov V
    Health Phys; 2015 Jan; 108(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 25437516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Key factors in imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments using the NAME model.
    Haywood SM; Bedwell P; Hort MC
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 20220209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Calibration measurements and standards for radiation protection dosimetry.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 15273350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Radiation cataracts: new data and new recommendations.
    Frey GD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W345-6. PubMed ID: 25247963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Radiotoxicological surveillance of personnel occupationally exposed to the hazards of internal radiocontamination in a nuclear center].
    Testa C; Delle Site A
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1977; 13(1-2):85-94. PubMed ID: 414645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. ICRP Publication 111 - Application of the Commission's recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency.
    Lochard J; Bogdevitch I; Gallego E; Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan A; Nisbet A; Oudiz A; Oudiz T; Strand P; Janssens A; Lazo T; Carr Z; Sugier A; Burns P; Carboneras P; Cool D; Cooper J; Kai M; Lecomte JF; Liu H; Massera G; McGarry A; Mrabit K; Mrabit M; Sjöblom KL; Tsela A; Weiss W;
    Ann ICRP; 2009 Jun; 39(3):1-4, 7-62. PubMed ID: 20472181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Conference Summary.
    Feinendegen LE
    Health Phys; 2020 Mar; 118(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 31990784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Path Forward.
    Waltar A
    Health Phys; 2020 Mar; 118(3):327-329. PubMed ID: 31990785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Welcoming Session.
    Glines WM
    Health Phys; 2020 Mar; 118(3):232-234. PubMed ID: 31990764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. INITIAL EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL DOSES IN THE EARLY PHASE OF A NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENT BASED ON IN-VIVO MONITORING DATA AND SIMULATED RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES.
    Challeton-de Vathaire C; Quentric E; Didier D; Blanchardon E; Davesne E; Rannou A; Agarande M; Renaud-Salis V; Franck D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Nov; 185(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 30590730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. (32)P measurment of urine samples and internal dose assessment for radiation workers in life science laboratories.
    Yoon S; Pak MJ; Park S; Yoo J; Ha WH; Jang HK; Kim JK
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):775-85. PubMed ID: 25325199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Quality management system in the CIEMAT Radiation Dosimetry Service.
    Martín R; Navarro T; Romero AM; López MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):111-4. PubMed ID: 21131328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Risk bases can complement dose bases for implementing and optimising a radiological protection strategy in urgent and transition emergency phases.
    Walsh L; Ulanowski A; Kaiser JC; Woda C; Raskob W
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2019 Nov; 58(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 31346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The medical technologist and the radiation-accident victim.
    Berger ME; Thompson DW; Ricks RC; Kaufmann D
    Am J Med Technol; 1981 Oct; 47(10):829-34. PubMed ID: 7332015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.