These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30138272)

  • 1. A Current Review of Biologic Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Nahabedian MY; Sosin M; Bhanot P
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):74S-81S. PubMed ID: 30138272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Current Review of Synthetic Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Cobb WS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):64S-71S. PubMed ID: 30138270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Current Review of Long-Acting Resorbable Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Petro CC; Rosen MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):84S-91S. PubMed ID: 30138274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mesh Selection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Lak KL; Goldblatt MI
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):99S-106S. PubMed ID: 30138277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Current Review of Hybrid Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Reid CM; Jacobsen GR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):92S-96S. PubMed ID: 30138275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical Approaches to Definitive Reconstruction of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects.
    Latifi R
    World J Surg; 2016 Apr; 40(4):836-48. PubMed ID: 26585951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma-A long-term prospective clinical trial.
    Birolini C; de Miranda JS; Tanaka EY; Utiyama EM; Rasslan S; Birolini D
    Hernia; 2020 Apr; 24(2):307-323. PubMed ID: 31493051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review.
    Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of biological mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Carver DA; Kirkpatrick AW; Eberle TL; Ball CG
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024091. PubMed ID: 30772851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hernia recurrence and infection rate in elective complex abdominal wall repair using biologic mesh.
    Kanitra JJ; Hess AL; Haan PS; Anderson CI; Kavuturu S
    BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):174. PubMed ID: 31752803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review.
    Henry CR; Bradburn E; Moyer KE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 23945531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.
    Sbitany H; Kwon E; Chern H; Finlayson E; Varma MG; Hansen SL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 24317239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controversies in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
    Baier KF; Rosen MJ
    Surg Clin North Am; 2021 Dec; 101(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 34774264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of complex abdominal herniorrhaphy: experience with 106 cases.
    Satterwhite TS; Miri S; Chung C; Spain D; Lorenz HP; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22421484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
    Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
    Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects.
    Atema JJ; de Vries FE; Boermeester MA
    Am J Surg; 2016 Nov; 212(5):982-995.e1. PubMed ID: 27443425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
    de Vries FEE; Hodgkinson JD; Claessen JJM; van Ruler O; Leo CA; Maeda Y; Lapid O; Obdeijn MC; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Constantinides J; Hanna GB; Warusavitarne J; Vaizey C; Boermeester MA
    Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):459-468. PubMed ID: 32078080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Perfect Plane: A Systematic Review of Mesh Location and Outcomes, Update 2018.
    Sosin M; Nahabedian MY; Bhanot P
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):107S-116S. PubMed ID: 30138278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence.
    Romain B; Story F; Meyer N; Delhorme JB; Brigand C; Rohr S
    J Wound Care; 2016 Jun; 25(6):320-5. PubMed ID: 27286664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?
    Köckerling F; Alam NN; Antoniou SA; Daniels IR; Famiglietti F; Fortelny RH; Heiss MM; Kallinowski F; Kyle-Leinhase I; Mayer F; Miserez M; Montgomery A; Morales-Conde S; Muysoms F; Narang SK; Petter-Puchner A; Reinpold W; Scheuerlein H; Smietanski M; Stechemesser B; Strey C; Woeste G; Smart NJ
    Hernia; 2018 Apr; 22(2):249-269. PubMed ID: 29388080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.