These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30138447)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of a new magnetic bead-based DNA extraction method from fecal samples for downstream next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
    McGaughey KD; Yilmaz-Swenson T; Elsayed NM; Cruz DA; Rodriguez RR; Kritzer MD; Peterchev AV; Gray M; Lewis SR; Roach J; Wetsel WC; Williamson DE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202858. PubMed ID: 30138447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
    Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
    Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
    Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
    Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction.
    Mirsepasi H; Persson S; Struve C; Andersen LO; Petersen AM; Krogfelt KA
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Jan; 7():50. PubMed ID: 24447346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
    Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies.
    Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.
    Ariefdjohan MW; Savaiano DA; Nakatsu CH
    Nutr J; 2010 May; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations.
    Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A
    Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.
    Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J
    Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens.
    Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA extraction for streamlined metagenomics of diverse environmental samples.
    Marotz C; Amir A; Humphrey G; Gaffney J; Gogul G; Knight R
    Biotechniques; 2017 Jun; 62(6):290-293. PubMed ID: 28625159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.
    Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Feces of Multiple Host Species for Downstream Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Hart ML; Meyer A; Johnson PJ; Ericsson AC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143334. PubMed ID: 26599606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of the fecal microbiome in different swine groups by high-throughput sequencing.
    Park SJ; Kim J; Lee JS; Rhee SK; Kim H
    Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():157-62. PubMed ID: 24954845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
    Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
    J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.